Saturday, December 24, 2016

The Bankruptcy of America, the Corporate United States, and the New World Order

Who is running America? Have you ever asked that question?

Under the doctrine of Parens Patriae, "Government As Parent", as a result of
the manipulated bankruptcy of the United States of America in 1930, ALL the
assets of the American people, their person, and of our country itself are
held by the Depository Trust Corporation at 55 Water Street, NY, NY, secured
by UCC Commercial Liens, which are then monetized as "debt money" by the
Federal Reserve.

It may interest you to know that under the umbrella of the Depository Trust
Corporation lies the CEDE Corporation, the Federal Reserve Corporation and
the American Bar Association, the legal arm of the banking interests.

Now you know who is running America!

You might want to take exception to the name on the marquee at the entrance
to 55 Water Street.

??? . . . "Tower of Power" . . . ???

Another thing to think about -- who owns the media and the news you are
fed??? Guess Who??? An Independent Press??? Ha!!!

Did you ever hear of the Independent Treasury Act of 1921? No, you say....

The Independent Treasury Act of 1921 suspended the de jure (meaning "by
right of legal establishment") Treasury Department of the United States

Our Congress turned the treasury department over to a private corporation,
the Federal Reserve and their agents.

The bulk of the ownership of the Federal Reserve System, a very well kept
secret from the American Citizen, is held by these banking interests:

Rothschild Bank of London
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Lehman Brothers of New York
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York

The Federal Reserve is at the root of most of our present laws. Basically,
the Federal Reserve is the "STATE" of the United States.

See "Our Enemy, The STATE" by Albert J. Nock - 1935, his Classic Critique
Distinguishing "Government" from the "STATE."

See Also Charts in Text Format of Interlocking Directorships and Family
Linkages taken from "Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and
Banking Influence. Staff Report, Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing,
House of Representatives, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, August 1976."

Thomas Jefferson once said:

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties
than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks
to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by
deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] .
. . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up
homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power
should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it
properly belongs."

-- Thomas Jefferson -- The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill,

Jefferson's prophesy has come true.

How did this happen? ......Hmmmmm..... Well, that is going to take a while
to explain.

All our law is private law, written by The National Law Institute, Law
Professors, and the Bar Association, the Agents of Foreign Banking

They have come to this position of writing the law by fraudulently deleting
the "Titles of Nobility and Honour" Thirteenth Amendment from the
Constitution for the United States, creating an oligarchy of Lawyers and
Bankers controlling all three branches of our government.

Most of our law comes directly through the Hague or the U.N. Almost all U.N.
treaties have been codified into the U.S. codes. That's where all our
educational programs originate. The U.N. controls our education system.

The Federal Register Act was created by Pres. Roosevelt in 1935. Title 3
sec. 301 et seq. by Executive Order. He gave himself the power to create
federal agencies and appoint a head of the agency. He then re-delegated his
authority to make law (statutory regulations) to those agency heads.

One big problem there, the president has no constitutional authority to make
law. Under the Constitution re-delegation of delegated authority is a felony

The president then gave the agencies the authority to tax. We now have
government by appointment running this country. This is the shadow
government sometimes spoken about, but never referred to as government by
appointment. This type of government represents taxation without

Perhaps this is why some people believe the Constitution was suspended. It
wasn't suspended, it was buried in bureaucratic red tape.

Now, it is an historical fact that with the Declaration of Independence, to
provide a united effort during and after the War for Independence, the
Colonies as independent nations joined together under the Articles of
Confederation, and as Independent Sovereign States drew up constitutions
which formed governments to serve the people of each former colony.

The Articles of Confederation, after a period of 8 years, were determined to
have several flaws. The Congress of delegates called a Convention in 1787 to
correct the flaws. The Convention, instead of modifying the Articles of
Confederation as directed, in secret sessions took it upon themselves to
write an entirely new Constitution, which when ratified by the State
Conventions of the Freemen of the Individual States, created the Federal
government to serve them in those areas where the States operating
individually could not effectively serve.

In this new Constitution the people and the States delegated to the Federal
government certain responsibilities, reserving all rights not so enumerated
to the States and to the People in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution.

As a consequence, the responsibility of the State became one of protecting
the people from the tyranny of federal government, to insure that the
federal government did not reach beyond the bounds of the Constitution. This
worked fairly effectively, until 1933 when Roosevelt assumed office.

The Conference of Chief Justices, Conference of State Court Administrators,
the National Associations of Attorney Generals, Secretaries of State and
State Auditors, State Purchasing Offices, Lieutenant Governors, and State
Legislators, and the Governors of the 50 states comprise the membership of
the Council of State Governments. The Council of State Governments is
located at 676 N. ST. Clair, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

The Council of State Governments has now been absorbed into the National
Conference on Uniform State Laws run by the Bar Association.

The movement for uniform state laws dates back more than a century. The
Alabama State Bar called for uniformity as early as 1881, but it was nearly
a decade later, at the 12th annual meeting of the ABA in 1889, that the
legal community made its formal motion to work for uniformity in the then 44
state union.

New York was the first state to move, appointing three commissioners in
1890. Other states soon heeded the call: Delaware, Georgia, Massachusetts,
Michigan, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania attended the first
Conference in Saratoga Springs, New York, in 1892.

The commissioners wasted no time. They urged adoption of three acts and
proposed raising the marrying age to 18 for males and 16 for females. They
also adopted a table of weights and measures, noting that with the exception
of wheat, legal weights of a bushel varied in all the states.

By the turn of the century, 33 states and two territories had appointed
commissioners on uniform laws. In 1910, only Nevada and the Territory of
Alaska still had not; they came aboard in 1912.

An Abridged Chronology

1890 - New York state legislature passes first state act authorizing
governor to appoint three commissioners. The American Bar Association
(ABA)recommends that other states follow New York's lead.

1891 - Connecticut's Lyman D. Brewster named to chair newly-created ABA
committee on uniform law. Pennsylvania, Michigan, Massachusetts, New Jersey
and Delaware appoint commissioners.

1892 - First conference held in Saratoga Springs New York. Above states plus
Georgia attend formal meeting.

1893 - Committees appointed on such subjects as wills, marriage and divorce,
commercial law, descent and distribution.

1895 - Conference requests committee on commercial law be formed. Drafts,
Negotiable Instrument Law, precursor to Article 3 of Uniform Comme\00\00\F3rcial

1896 - Negotiable Instrument Law approved by Conference. First time that a
uniform act is adopted in every state and the District of Columbia.

1897 - For the first time, Commissioners urged to work toward enactment of
uniform legislation in their states.

1898/1899 - Sessions devoted to the consideration of proposed divorce

1899 - At the end of the 1890s, 33 of the existing 45 states and two
territories had appointed uniform law commissioners and eight uniform acts
had been drafted, each enacted in at least one state. All these acts were
subsequently superseded or declared obsolete.

1900 - Uniform Divorce Procedure Act adopted. Louis B. Brandeis begins five
years of service as member of Massachusetts commission.

1901 - Woodrow Wilson begins tenure (until 1908) as commissioner from New

1903 - ABA makes first appropriation in support of work of Conference. James
Barr Ames of Harvard Law School commissioned to draft the Uniform
Partnership Act\00\00\F5.

1905 - Samuel W. Pennypacker, Pennsylvania Governor, invites other governors
to send delegation to a national divorce conference--meets twice in 1906;
three acts endorsed.

1906 - First roll call by states as Uniform Warehouse Receipts Act is
approved. Legal scholar Roscoe Pound serves for one year as a commissioner
from Nebraska.

1907 - Uniform Desertion Act and Non-Support Act and Uniform Marriage Act
authorized. Act Regulating Annulment of Marriage of Divorce adopted. Also,
Act Providing for the Return of Marriage Statistics, Act Providing for the
Return of Divorce Statistics.

1908 - Work begins on Uniform Corporation Act.

1910 - Twenty uniform acts approved in decade of the teens. The Uniform
Partnership Act, begun in 1906, was completed by William Draper Lewis, Dean
of the University of Pennsylvania Law School.

1911 - Uniform Marriage and Marriage License Act and Uniform Child Labor Act

1912 - Uniform Marriage Evasion Act adopted. Woodrow Wilson, commissioner\00\00\EA
from New Jersey from 1901 to 1908 elected U.S. President in a landslide.

1914 - Uniform Partnership Act completed. Will be adopted by all the states.
Also Foreign Acknowledgement Act, Cold Storage Act, Workmens's Compensation

1915 - Name changed to National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State
Laws. Constitution and by-laws completely revised. Each act now must be
considered section by section during at least two annual meetings.

1916 - Uniform Limited Partnership Act as well as Extradition of Persons of
Unsound Minds Act approved, also Land Registration Act.

1917 - Uniform Flag Act approved.

1918 - Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act approved.

1920 - Certain Acts withdrawn; others declared obsolete. After pruning, 26
acts remain as recommended for passage in state legislatures.

1930 - During the 30s, Conference adopts 31 acts.

1935 - Conference entered into agreement with American Law Institute for
cooperative drafting of acts in area of common intere\00\00\F1st.

1936 - After revisions, withdrawals and acts declared obsolete, 53 uniform
acts remained as recommended for approval.

On April 25, 1938, the Supreme Court overturned the standing precedents of
the prior 150 years concerning "COMMON LAW" in the federal government.

or GENERAL in their nature, be they COMMERCIAL LAW or a part of LAW OF
TORTS." (See: ERIE RAILROAD CO. vs. THOMPKINS, 304 U.S. 64, 82 L. Ed. 1188)

The Common Law is the fountain source of Substantive and Remedial Rights, if
not our very Liberties. The members and associates of the Bar thereafter
formed committees, granted themselves special privileges, immunities and
franchises, and held meetings concerning the Judicial procedures, and
further, to amend laws "to conform to a trend of judicial decisions or to
accomplish similar objectives", including hodgepodging the jur\00\00\E5isdictions of
Law and Equity together, which is known today as "One Form of Action." [See:
Constitution and By Laws, Article 3, Section 3.3(c), 1990-91 Reference Book,
see also Colorado Methods of Practice, West Publishing, Vol. 4, pages 2-3,
Authors Comments.]

1939 - ABA gets more involved in approval of uniform law products.
Thirty-nine acts are presented to the Board of Governors of the ABA for
consideration and approval. During the same year, all acts on aeronautics
and motor vehicles are eliminated as well as the Land Registration Act,
Child Labor Act of 1930, Uniform Divorce Jurisdiction Act, Firearms Act,
Marriage Act and more. Six acts are reclassified as Model acts.

1940 - At start of decade, after deletions, etc., 53 acts out of 93 which
had been approved since the group's founding remain on the books. Drafting
committee for the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) approved.

1941 - Speaking of the Commercial Code project, the Conference president
states: "\00\00\E9is is the most important and the most far reaching project on
which the conference has ever embarked." It would take the major part of the
next 10 tear period to complete.

1942 - UCC effort begins in earnest with completion of work on the revised
Uniform Sales Act.

1943 - Members of the conference participate in drafting committee in
Washington, D.C. to work on legislation which the government might desire in
connection with the war effort. No new acts.

1944 - Conference receives $150,000 grant from the Falk Foundation of
Pittsburgh to support work on the UCC.

1945 - No annual meeting for the first time due to difficulties of civilian
transport during the war.

1946 - Falk Foundation increases its support of the UCC with an additional

1947 - Uniform Law Conference (ULC) and American Law Institute join in
partnership to put all the components together for the UCC. Uniform Divorce
Recognition Act approved.

1950 - Approval of the Uniform Marriage License Ap\00\00\F0plication Act, Uniform
Adoption Act and the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA).
The latter has been one of the most successful ULC products.

1951 - On May 18, during a joint meeting with the American Law Institute in
Washington, D.C., the UCC was approved. Later that year the ABA formally
approved the code as well. Considered the outstanding accomplishment of the
Conference, the Code remains the ULC's signature product.

One of the Uniform Laws drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners
on Uniform State Laws and the American Law Institute governing commercial
transactions (including sales and leasing of goods, transfer of funds,
commercial paper, bank deposits and collections, letters of credit, bulk
transfers, warehouse receipts, bills of lading, investment securities, and
secured transactions), The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), has been adopted
in whole or substantially by all states. (See: Blacks Law, 6th Ed. pg. 1531)

In essence, all court decis\00\00\EFions are based on commercial law or business law
and has criminal penalties associated with it. Rather than openly calling
this new law Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdiction, it is called Statutory

America as a bankrupt nation is owned completely by its creditors.

The creditors own the Congress, they own the Executive, they own the
Judiciary and they own all the State governments. Do you have a Birth
Certificate? They own you too.

1952 - Uniform Rules of Criminal Procedure approved---first venture of the
Conference into this area of the law.

1953 - Pennsylvania the first state to enact the UCC. Uniform Rules of
Evidence adopted.

1954 - Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act approved.

1956 - Gift to Minors Act approved. Will be adopted in every state. For the
first time, ULC enters the field of international law.

1957 - Massachusetts becomes second state to enact the UCC, after revisions
by the Editorial Board.

1958 - Uniform Securities Act approved.

1960 - Un\00\00\D4iform Paternity Act passed. by 1960, UCC enacted in Kentucky,
Connecticut, New Hampshire and Rhode Island.

1961 - Permanent Editorial Board on the UCC formed---8 more states pass UCC.
Constitution amended to provide that all members of Conference must be
members of the bar.

1962 - Four more states adopt UCC, including New York. Probate Code project

1963 - Third comprehensive law project approved, on retail installment
sales, consumer credit, small loans and usury. Eleven more UCC states.
William H. Renquist begins term as commissioner from Arizona; serves until

1964 - Special Committee of Uniform Divorce and Marriage laws recommends
that a study of divorce law be authorized and that funds be sought. One more
UCC state.

1965 - Divorce and Marriage Law committee instructed to commence drafting if
funds can be obtained for the project. Thirteen more UCC states.

1966 - Five more UCC states.

1968 - Much of annual meeting devoted to\00\00\DC the Uniform Consumer Credit Code
and the Uniform Probate Code ---two projects nearing completion. By 1968, 49
states, the District of Columbia and U.S. Virgin Islands have enacted the
UCC---only exception being Louisiana. A big year. Other developments in
1968: the Consumer Credit Code is approved as well as revisions to the
Anatomical Gift Act, Child Custody Jurisdiction Act and revisions to URESA.

1969 - Probate Code approved. Preliminary analysis of the uniform marriage
and divorce legislation distributed.

1970 - Controlled Substances Act and Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act

1971 - Uniform Alcoholism and Intoxication Act approved.

1972 - Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Disposition of Community
Property Rights At Death Act and UMVARA, the Uniform Motor Vehicle Accident
Reparations Act approved.

1973 - Uniform Parentage Act supersedes Paternity Act. Uniform Crime Victims
Reparations Act approved.

1974 - Conference approves Rule\00\00\E1s of Criminal Procedure and Eminent Domain
Code. Louisiana, the only state not to adopt the Uniform Commercial Code due
to difficulties in reconciling its provisions with those of the Civil Code,
adopts Articles 1,3,4,5,7, and 8.

1975 - Uniform Land Transactions Act approved.

1976 - Major revision of the Uniform Partnership Act approved; also Uniform
Simplification of Land Transfers and Uniform Class Action Acts.

1978 - Uniform Brain Death and Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act

1979 - Uniform Trade Secrets and Durable Power of Attorney acts among those

1980 - Determination of Death Act supersedes 1978 Brain Death Act. Uniform
Planned Community Act, Model Real Estate Time-Share Act and Model Periodic
Payment of Judgments Act also adopted.

1981 - Two important updated acts approved: new Model State Administration
Procedure and Unclaimed Property Acts. Also two new acts: the Model Real
Estate Cooperative Act and the Uniform Conservation \00\00\E3Easement Act.

1982 - Uniform Condominium and Planned Community Acts and Model Real Estate
Cooperative Act combined into the Uniform Common Interest Ownership act.

The enumerated, specified, and distinct Jurisdictions established by the
ordained Constitution (1789), Article III, Section 2, and under the Bill of
Rights (1791), Amendment VII, were further hodgepodged and fundamentally
changed in 1982 to include Admiralty Jurisdiction, which was once again
brought inland.

This was the FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE necessary to effect unification of CIVIL and
Actions At Law and Suits in Equity, this CHANGE WOULD ABOLISH THE

(See: Federal Rules of Procedure, 1982 Ed., pg. 17. Also see Federalist
Papers, No. 83, Declaration Of Resolves Of The First Continental Congress,
Oct. 14th, 1774, Declaration Of Cause And Necessity Of Taking Up Arms, July
16, 1775, Declaration Of Independence, July 4, 1776, Bennet vs. Butterworth,
52 U.S. 669)

1983 - Uniform Marital Property Act and Uniform Premarital agreement Act
approved. Uniform Transfers to Minors Act replaces the uniformly enacted
Uniform Gifts to Minors Act.

1984 - Uniform Statutory Will Act approved; new Uniform fraudulent Transfer
Act supersedes Fraudulent Conveyance Act of 1918.

1985 - Uniform Health-Care Information Act, Uniform Land Security Interest
act, Uniform Personal Property Leasing Act and Uniform Rights of the
Terminally Ill Act approved.

1986 - New drafting effort to revise Articles 3 and 4 of the UCC and draft
new provisions begins.

1987 - Approval of the revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act approved as well
as new Uniform Custodial Trust Act, Uniform Construction Lien Act and
Uniform Franchise and Business Opportunities Act. Also revision of Rules of
Criminal Procedure.

1988 - Final approval of amendments to the Uniform Securities Act and
amendments to Article 6 of the UCC dealing with bulk sales. Conference also
approves Uniform Statutory Form Power of Attorney Act and Uniform Punitive
and Unknown Fathers Act and takes on the controversial issue of surrogate
mother contracts with Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.

1989 - Article 4A of the UCC, dealing with electronic funds transfers,
approved. Also approved: amendments to the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act,
authorizing withdrawal of life support by a surrogate decision maker; the
Uniform Pretrial Detention Act, confining violent criminals before trial;
the Uniform Non-probate Transfers on Death Act and amendments to Article VI
of the Uniform Probate Code.

1990 - Major revision of 1970 Uniform Controlled Substances Act-- the law in
46 jurisdictions-- approved. Substantial revision of UCC Article 3 also
approved, as well as an updated Article II of the Uniform Probate Code, to
keep pace with current thinking on marital proper\00\00\DFty.

This private corruption of the law has occurred despite the Constitutional
responsibility conferred on Congress by Article I, Section 8 of the Federal
Constitution which states that it is Congress that "makes all Laws."

What does that have to do with anything? Uniform Laws seem to be a good

Well now, that is a good question. Let us continue.....

An Expose On The Legal Fraud Perpetrated On All Americans


The concept of DEBTORS and CREDITORS is very important to understand.

Every legal action where you are brought before the court: e.g. traffic
ticket, property dispute or permits, income tax, credit cards, bank loans or
anything else government might dream up to charge you where you find
yourself in front of a court.

It is an equity court, administrating commercial law having a
debtor-creditor law as the controlling law. Today, we have an equity cour\00\00\ECt
but not an equity court as defined by the Constitution of the United States
or any other legal documents before 1938.

All the courts of this once great land have been changed starting with the
Supreme Court decision of 1938 in ERIE V. THOMPKINS. I'll give you
background which led to this decision.

There is a terrible FRAUD being perpetrated on all Americans. Please
understand that this fraud is a 24 hour, 7 days a week, year after year
continuous fraud. This fraud is constantly upon you all your life. It
doesn't just happen once in a while. This fraud is perpetually and
incessantly upon you and your family.


In order for you to understand just how this fraud works, you need to know
the history of its inception.

It goes like this: From 1928 -1932 there were five years of Geneva
conventions. The nations of the world met in Geneva Switzerland for 5
continuous years in order to set up what would be the policy of all the
participating countries.

During the year of 1930 the U.S., Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy,
Spain, Portugal etc. all declared bankruptcy. If you try to look up the 1930
minutes, you will not find them because they don't publish this particular
volume. If you try to find the 1930 volume which contains the minutes of
what happened, you will probably not find it. This volume has been pulled
out of circulation or is hidden in the library and is very hard to find.
This volume contains the evidence of the bankruptcy.

Going into 1932, they stopped meeting in Geneva. In 1932 Franklin Roosevelt
came into power as President of the United States. Roosevelt's job was to
put into place and administer the bankruptcy that had been declared two
years earlier.

The corporate government needed a key Supreme Court decision. The corporate
United States government had to have a legal case on the books to set the
stage for recognizing, implementing and supporting the bankruptcy.

Now, this doesn't mean the bankruptcy wasn't implemented before 1938 with
the Erie vs. Thompkins decision. The bankruptcy started in 1930-1931. The
bankruptcy definitely started when Roosevelt came into office. He was sworn
in during the month of January 1933.

He started right away in the bankruptcy with what is known as 'The Banking
Holiday," and proceeded in pulling the gold coin out of circulation. That
was the beginning of the corporate United States Public Policy for
bankruptcy.. Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 & Executive Order 6260
"Trading With The Enemy Act."


It is a known historical fact that during 1933 and 1937 - 1938, there was a
big fight between Roosevelt and the Supreme Court Justices. Roosevelt tried
to stack the Supreme court with a bunch of his pals. Roosevelt tried to
enlarge the number of justices and he tried to change the slant of the
justices. The corporate United States had to have one Supreme Court case
which would support their bankrup\00\00\EDtcy problem.

There was resistance to Roosevelt's court stacking efforts. Some of the
justices tried to warn us that Roosevelt was tampering with the law and with
the courts. Roosevelt was trying to see to it that prior decisions of the
court were overturned. He was trying to bring in a new order, a new
procedure for the law of the land.


A bankruptcy case was needed on the books to legitimize the fact that the
corporate U.S. had already declared bankruptcy! This bankruptcy was
effectuated by compact that the corporate several states had with the
corporate government (Corporate Capitol of the several corporate states).
This compact tied the corporate several states to corporate Washington D.C,
(the headquarters of the corporation called "The United States").

Since the United States Corporation, having established its headquarters
within the District of Columbia, declared itself to be in the state of
bankruptcy, it automatically decl\00\00\F2ared bankruptcy for all its subsidiaries
who were effectively connected corporate members (who happened to be the
corporate state governments of the Union).

The corporate state governments didn't have to vote on the bankruptcy. The
bankruptcy automatically became effective by reason of the Compact/Agreement
between each of the corporate state governments and THE MOTHER CORPORATION.

(Note: the liberty of using the term "Mother Corporation" to communicate the
interconnected power of the corporate Federal government relative to her
associated corporate States has been taken.)

It is Historical knowledge that the original Union States created the
Federal Government, however, for all practical purposes, the Federal
government has taken control of her "Creators", the States.)

She has become a beast out of control for power. She has for her trade names
the following: "United States", "U.S.", "U.S.A.", "United States of
America", Washington D.C., District of Columbia, Feds. and Federal \00\00\ED

She has her own U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Parks, Post Office etc.
etc. etc. Because she is claiming to be bankrupt, she freely gives her land,
her personnel, and the money she steals from the Americans via the IRS and
her state corporations, to the United Nations and the International Bankers
as payment for her debt. The UN and the International Bankers use this money
and services for various world wide projects, including war.

War is an extremely lucrative business for the bankers of the New World
Order. Loans for destruction. Loans for re-construction. Loans for
controlling people in her new world order.


The corporate U.S. then, is the head corporate member, who met at Geneva to
decide for all its corporate body members. The corporate representatives of
the corporate several states were in attendance. If the states had their own
power to declare bankruptcy regardless of whether Washington D.C. declared
bankruptcy or not, then the several states would have been represented at

The several states of America were not represented. Consequently, whatever
Washington D.C. agreed to at Geneva was passed on automatically, via compact
to the several corporate states as a group, association, corporation or as a
club member; they all agreed and declared bankruptcy as one government
corporate group in 1930.

The several states only needed a representative at Geneva by way of the U.S.
in Washington D.C. The delegates of the corporate United States attended the
meetings and spoke for the several corporate states as well as for the
Federal Corporate Government. And, presto, BANKRUPTCY was declared for all!

From 1930 to 1938 the states could not enact any law or decide any case that
would go against the Federal Government. The case had to come down from the
Federal level so that the states could then rely on the Federal decision and
use this decision within the states as justification for the b\00\00\F8ankruptcy
process within the states.

Ah, Ha, are you beginning to get the picture?

By 1938 the corporate Federal Government had the true bankruptcy case they
had been looking for. Now, the bankruptcy that had been declared back in
1930 could be upheld and administered. That's why the Supreme Court had to
be stacked and made corrupt from within. The new players on the Supreme
Court fully understood that they had to destroy all other case law that had
been established prior to 1938.

The Federal Government had to have a case to destroy all precedent, all
appearance, and even the statute of law itself. That is, the Statutes at
large had to be perverted. They finally got their case in Erie vs.

It was right after that case that the American Law Institute and the
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws listed right in
the front of the Uniform Commercial Code, began creating the Uniform
Commercial Code that is on our backs today. Let us quote directly from the
preface of the Official Text of the Uniform Commercial Code 12th Edition:

"The Code was originally approved by its sponsors and the American Bar
Association in 1952, and was revised in 1958 to incorporate a number of
changes that had been recommended by the New York Law Revision Commission
and other agencies. Subsequent amendments that were deemed desirable in
light of experience under the Code were approved by the Permanent Editorial
Board in 1962 and 1966"

The above named groups and associations of private lawyers got together and
started working on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). It was somewhere
between 1938 and 1940, I don't recall, but by the early 40's and during the
war, this committee was working to form the UCC and getting it ready to go
on the market.

The UCC is the Law Merchant's code for the administration of the bankruptcy.
The UCC is now the law of the land as far as the courts are concerned. This
Legal Committee of lawyers put everything: Negotiable Instruments, Security,
Sales, Contracts, and the whole mess under the UCC. That's where the
"Uniform" word comes from. It means it was uniform from state to state as
well as being uniform with the District of Columbia.

It doesn't mean you didn't have the uniform instrument laws on the books
before this time. It means the laws were not uniform from state to state. By
the middle 1960's, every state had passed the UCC into law. The states had
no choice but to adopt newly formed Uniform Commercial Code as the Law of
the Land. The states fully understood they had to administrate Bankruptcy.
Washington D.C. adopted the Uniform Commercial Code in 1963, just six weeks
after President John F. Kennedy was killed.


What was the effect and the significance of Erie vs. Thompkins case decision
of 1938? The significance is that since the Erie Decision, no cases are
allowed to be cited that are prior to 1938. There can be no mixing \00\00\FAof the
old law with the new law.

The lawyers, who are members of the American Bar Association, were and are
currently under and controlled by the Lawyer's guild of Great Britain,
created, formed, and implemented the new bankruptcy law. The American Bar
Association is a franchise of the Lawyer's Guild of Great Britain.

Since the Erie vs. Thompkins case was decided, the practice of law in this
country was never again to be the same. It has been reported, that every
lawyer in existence, and every lawyer coming up has to take a "secret" oath
to support bankruptcy.

As Officers of the Court they have sworn to uphold the law as it exists, and
as they have been taught. In so doing, not only do the lawyers promise to
support the bankruptcy, but the lawyers and judges promise never to reveal
who the true creditor/party is in the bankruptcy proceedings (if, indeed,
many of them are even aware or know).

In court, there is never identification and appearance of the true character
and principle of the proceedings. If there is no appearance of the true
party to the action, then there is no way the defendant is able to know the
CAUSE OF WHY YOU ARE IN FRONT OF THEIR COURT. The court is forbidden to tell
you that information.

That's why, if you question the true nature and cause, the judge will tell
you "It's not my job to tell you. You are not retaining me as an attorney
and I can't give you legal advice from the bench. I suggest you hire a


The problem here is, if you hire a lawyer who is pledged not to reveal the
true nature and the cause, how will you ever find out the nature and the
cause? YOU WON'T! If the true nature and the cause of the action against you
is revealed, it will expose the real creditor from whom this action and
cause came. In other words, they will have to name the TRUE creditor. The
true creditor will have to state the nature and the cause. The \00\00\E6true creditor
will have to say "It's a bankruptcy proceeding." The true creditor will have
to say, "I'm the creditor and he's the debtor."

That declaration would open the door for you to question "Who the hell are
you? How did you get attached to my back and by what vehicle did I promise
to become a debtor to you?" In this country, the courts on every level, from
the justice of the peace level all the way up...... even into the
International law arena, (called the World Court), are administrating the
bankruptcy and are pledged not to reveal who the true creditors really are
and how you personally became pledged as a party or participant to the
corporate United States debt.

What would really kill these people off, would be to compel the
International Bankers to send a lawyer into the courtroom and present

The International Bankers told these various countries that they were now in
a state of bankruptcy. The countries had been taken over by the
creditor/bankers. And there was no choice, but for all these participating
countries to declare bankruptcy.

If they didn't agree to declare bankruptcy, the bankers threatened to
collapse the economies and thereby put the countries back into the
depression like the one from which they were just emerging. The bankers made
an offer they couldn't refuse. To review and elaborate: In 1930 there was a
world wide depression.

The Bankers said, "Look. You can do it either of two ways. The easy way or
the hard way." "You just accept the bankruptcy and we'll let you out of the
depression. If you don't, you're on your own." So all the countries involved
agreed, because they realized that the International bankers had them by the
throat. The countries therefore agreed that over a period of several years
that they would pass statutes and legislation for the implementation of the
bankruptcy in favor of the international bankers.

Now, it would probably be correct to say that the key bankers were the
Rothschild's and their agents by way of Rockefeller, by way of the Federal
Reserve Bank. Who the bankers were is immaterial. The fact remains that
there was an International bankruptcy, and an International conspiracy to
cover it up.

There was a banking creditor who made the offer; the countries accepted the
offer in order to enable the representative countries to continue without
revolution and to allow the politicians to remain comfortably in place.
Under a delusion of solvency the countries were allowed to continue to
operate as though they were solvent; while in fact, the representative
countries were bankrupt.


The bankruptcy scheme was/is an extremely clever and diabolical plan. How
did they possibly pull this scheme off in the area of real estate? The
bankers did it with real estate, the same way they did it in the area of
Federal Income Taxes.

These Foreign bankers simply and deceptively devised ways and means to con
you into declaring yourself as a "CITIZEN" or a "RESIDENT" of the corporate
U.S. Remember the corporate United States is Bankrupt per agreement and
public policy.

After you have been tricked into claiming you are one of their corporate
United States Citizens, you are given a social security number which ties
you to certain meager "benefits" and "privileges." Then, the bankers con
your employer to function as an unpaid tax collector to con you into filling
out their W-4 intangible property gift forms and 1040 voluntary agreements.

These slick paper agreements establish your "voluntary" indebtedness to the
banker creditor. If at any time you decide to balk at this scheme because
you don't like it, the real creditor never has to make an appearance in
court to list the true nature and cause of the action which is being brought
against you.

You end up dealing with an agency. The agency can conveniently grant itself
immunity from prosecution because all it is doing (without your knowledge,
of course) is administrating the bankruptcy to which the government agreed
to per the Geneva meetings.

The court system never lets you put the original creditor on the courtroom
stand, so you can ask him how he got attached to your back. The system is
set up in such a way that the true creditor is protected and never has to
make an appearance and never has to answer any of your questions or produce

Therefore, the true creditor never has to produce the law that gives him the
right to pledge you (your body and labor) into indebtedness

Why? Because the Geneva agreement in 1930 was done by treaty. The bankruptcy
was not done by legislation. The agreement came first; signed in secrecy,
THEN Congress began to pass legislation to fulfill the bankruptcy obligation
required by the treaty.

Legislation being passed by Congress was henceforth and is thereby
bankruptcy legislation. When cases came before the courts, the courts could
make decisions based on the new controlling law of bankruptcy.

It had nothing to do with Constitutional rights. Now, any case brought in is
under the new bankruptcy law and is not considered as a true constitutional
case. It is now a bankruptcy case as distinct from, but cleverly disguised
as a constitutional case.


The members of the Supreme Court, of course, realized what was happening to
them and the system of law. The court was being asked to perform in a
creditor, debtor bankrupt proceeding to the benefit of the banker creditors.

The members of the Supreme Court said, "NO. We will not give you a bankrupt
proceeding decision that you can then enforce against everybody; a decision
not only effecting corporate Washington D.C. but also having effect within
the corporate state governments."

This, by the way, is fraud. It wouldn't be fraud if the government of
corporate Washington D.C. and the government of the several corporate states
declared bankruptcy then let the people know about the bankruptcy. (Notice:
when I say corporate "government" I don't mean you and me. You and I are not
the corporate government.)

The corporate government is the corporate capital of the corporate state.
The government is a neutral government zone known as the corporate capital
of the corporate state. The government is where the corporate state is. It
is corporate headquarters. Just like corporate Washington D.C. is the seat
of the corporate Federal Government.

The capital of the corporate state is the seat of the corporate state
government. If the corporate Federal Government and her subsidiary corporate
state governments want to join forces and declare bankruptcy that's not
fraud. This is their corporate business.

However, it is fraud when those two corporate entities declare bankruptcy
but do not disclose to you, me, and every other American, that they have so
declared bankruptcy.

Further they have not and do not disclose that their intention is to get you
and every other American in this country to pledge to pay off their
corporate debt to their corporate creditors. The corporate bankruptcy is the
corporate state and federal responsibility, not the responsibility of
Americans, The People.


"We the People" who created and signed the
contract/compact/agreement/charter of, by, and for the Constitutional
Corporation (U.S.) using the trade name of the "United States of America,"
is a corporate entity (legal fiction) which is DISTINCT AND SEPARATE from
Americans or the unenfranchised people of America.

The private natural American people did not create the corporation of the
United States. The United States Inc. did not create the private natural
American people. America and Americans were in existence prior to the
creati\00\00\F0on of the United States Corporation. The United States Corporation has
located its U.S. headquarters in Washington D.C.

Virginia State (state territory) gave land to the newly formed United States
Corporation. Notice here, we have a state giving something of value (land)
to the United States. The United Stales Corporation agreed in the
Constitutional contract, to protect the States.

Instead, because of their bankruptcy (Corporate U.S. Bankruptcy) this
particular U.S. corporation has enslaved the States and the people by
deception and at the will of their foreign bankers with whom they have been
doing business. Our forefathers gave their lives and property to prevent

Today, we are again enslaved. Private natural American people have been
tricked, deceived, and set-up to carry the U.S. Inc. perpetual corporate
debt under bankruptcy laws. Every time Americans appear in court, the
corporate U.S. bankruptcy is being administrated against them without their
knowledge and lawful consent.

That is FRAUD.

All corporate bankruptcy administration is done by "Public Policy" of by and
for the Mother Corporation (U.S. Inc.).


The corporate bankruptcy is carried out under the corporate public policy of
the corporate Federal Government in corporate Washington D.C. The states use
state public policy to carry out Federal public policy of Washington D.C.
Public policy and only public policy is being administered against you in
the corporate courts today.

The public policy that is dictated by all the courts, from the smallest to
the most powerful courts in the world, is public policy. This is why I said,
in another tape that the Russian people would be enslaved into indebtedness.

What will happen is that it will become public policy in Russia to have the
people go into joint corporate debt. The Russians will be forced to promise
to pay those debts. They will be forced to pay off on those corporate debts.
Corporate public policy is the crux of the whole bankruptcy implementation.

Corporate public policy is forever a Corporate public policy and the laws
that have passed since 1938 are all corporate public policy laws dealing
only with corporate public policy.

Understand that U.S. corporate public policy is not an American public
policy. The public policy is OF, (belonging to) the United States
corporation. This U.S. corporate bankruptcy public policy is not OF
(belonging to) America, the Republic.

The Erie vs. Thompkins 1938 case was a decision based upon public policy.
All decisions at any level since 1938, have been public policy decisions.
All statutes, rules, regulations, and procedures that have been passed,
whether civil or criminal, whether it is Federal or State, have all been
passed to implement the public policy of bankruptcy.

Since 1933, when FDR came into office, he brought in public policy. He
established that it was the public policy of the government to call in all
the gold. It was the public policy of the government to declare a banking

It was the public policy of the Government in Washington D.C., (the Federal
Government) to give out government assistance. Public policy operates the
same within the states. All Federal court decisions can only be handed down
if the states support Federal public policy. The state legal system must be
compatible with the Federal legal system.


This is why, when people like us go to court without being represented by a
lawyer, we throw a monkey-wrench into their corporate administrative
proceedings. Why? Because all public policy corporate lawyers are pledged to
up-hold public policy, which is the corporate U.S. administration of their
corporate bankruptcy.

That's why you'll find stamped on many if not all our briefs, "THIS CASE IS
The reason for this notation is that when we go in to defend ourselves or
file a claim we are not supporting the corporate bankruptcy administration
and procedure. The arguments we put forth predate 1938.

We come in with Constitutional law etc. All these early cases support our
rights not to be in bankruptcy. However, the corporate court, lawyers, and
judges have promised to give no judicial recognition of any case before


Before 1938, the law was not a public policy law. All these old cases were
not public law deciding cases. Today, the cases are all decided under
corporate public policy. The public policy exists in order to administer the
bankruptcy for the benefit of the banker creditors and to protect the banker

Corporate public policy can allow the creditor to say to the corporate
legislatures, "I want a law passed requiring my debtors to wear seat belts.
Why? Because I want to be able to milk my debtors for the longest period

It\00\00\EF doesn't behoove the creditor to allow all of his labor producing debtors
die at an average age 30 years. What would happen to the bankers' lending,
interest, penalties, increase, repayment etc., on the entire funding and
lending process if the average American life span was only 30 years? Why,
the bankers would have to have 2 1/2 times the current consumer population
to equal their current take.

The bankers would need (instead of 250 million Americans) 600 million or
even more. Maybe the bankers would need 2 Billion Americans because the
individual can't contract for debt until he/she is 18 or 21 years of age.
Therefore, if the average life span is only a 30 year period, the creditor
could collect on the debt for only 12 years.

Now, if the bankers can just get people to live an average of 70 years) you
are talking a whopping 50 years of indebtedness for which they contract and
for which they are forced to pay back with usury/interest. With this
situation, the banker creditor \00\00\F7can now float loans worth 50 years of
potential indebtedness and its payoff with interest in the name of the
people, as opposed to 9 to 12 years.

The creditors and their property and their people are well taken care of.
The creditor doesn't want the population to decrease per se, unless, it is
convenient for the debtor to run up debts in another's name and then
liquidate that debtor or that group of debtor people. For example let's
consider the AIDS problem today among the black people. What better group to
inject AIDS into than the black people?

Read the Strecker Memorandum on AIDS and the World Health Organization
connection. This documents their tainted vaccination program in Africa and
elsewhere. Why not kill them off? Don't you understand that the blacks as a
whole have absorbed all the debt that they can? The blacks have reached the
maximum of the debt that they can carry. In fact, they have gone over their
limit to pay back. They are now heavily into welfare, public housing,
medicaid, medicare, food stamps etc.. Now, the situation is that instead of
paying off the creditor, they have become a drain on the creditor. The
creditor must now pay them to live and take care of them. What creditor in
his right mind wants to spend money on a bunch of people from whom he can't
collect any revenue?

The corporate public policy of the corporate United States and the states
and the county and of the cities are that YOU must take care of these
people. You must provide them with welfare etc. Why? Because when you, as a
member of the corporate body politic allow laws to be passed which says the
minorities must be taken care of, then the corporate legislature can say the
public policy is that the people want these people taken care of. Therefore,
when given the chance, the legislature can say the public policy is that the
people want these blacks and poor whites to be taken care of and given a
chance, therefore, we must raise taxes to fund all these benefits,
privileges and opportunities.

This is what these people need to make them socially, politically, and
economically equal with everyone else. The legislatures have passed all
kinds of statutes providing for huge indebtedness and they float the
indebtedness off your backs because you have never gone into court to
challenge them by telling them it is not your public policy to assume the
debts of other people. On the contrary, all the court decisions coming put,
indicate it is the corporate public policy and it is your willingness to
support the corporate public policy to pay off these debts.

Remember, "public" means of and for the corporate Government. It does not
mean of and for private people. "Public" means corporate government. It is
corporate government policy. When they talk about public debt, they are
talking about corporate government debt and your presumed pledge against
this corporate created debt.


How do they work this scheme in the area of real estate? These banker creeps
have made an agreement that it is corporate public policy, that all land
(property) be pledged to the creditor to satisfy the debt of the bankruptcy,
which the creditor claims under bankruptcy. They get away with this the same
way they get away with any other case that is brought before the court,
whether it is a traffic ticket, IRS, or whatever.

Here is how it works. You have signed instruments giving information and
jurisdiction to the bankers through their agents. The instruments (forms)
you signed include, but are not limited to the following: social security
registration, use of the social security number, IRS forms, driver license,
traffic citation, jury duty, voter registration, using their address, zip
code, U.S. postal service, a deed, a mortgage application, etc. etc.

The bankers then use that instrument (document) under the Uniform Commercial
Code (UCC) as a contract/agreement. These documents are considered
promissory contract where you promise to perform. This scheme involves you,
without you ever becoming directly in contact or in contract with the true
creditor. What's more, you are never informed as to whom that true creditor
is and it is never divulged to you the true nature and the true cause of the
paperwork that you are filling out.

If you will examine your real estate deed, you will find that you promised
to pay taxes to the corporate government. On property you originally
acquired through a mortgage, you will notice that the bank never promised to
pay taxes. You did. The corporate government at all levels never promised to
pay taxes to the creditor. You did.

In tax and collection problems relating to real estate being enforced
against you, you will notice that there is no mention in the mortgage or the
deed stating the true nature and cause of the action.

Since you have made the promise to perform, you get a bill every year for
property taxes. You don't realize that the only way th\00\00\EAey can bill you for
taxes is through your own stupidity of agreeing to pay the tax. You
volunteered. They took advantage of you, conning you to promise to pay
properly taxes. When they send you their bill, they are coming against you
for the collection of the promise you made to the creditor.

Now the creditor on the paperwork appears that it is the local bank. The
bank has loaned you credit. The bank hasn't loaned you anything. It is not
their credit to loan. This is why the bank can't loan credit. There is a
credit involved, but not the bank's credit. It is the credit of the
International Bankers.

The International Bankers are making you the loan based upon their operation
of bankruptcy claim which they presume to have against you personally as
well as your property. Now, let's say you get a tax bill and you decide "I'm
not going to pay it." You will find that the courts and the lawyers and the
county agencies are set up to protect the true creditor simply by not
identifying the creditor. By not being identified as the true creditor, the
international banker can make you a credit loan that has no value in

In the case of real property, he claims to loan you the use of your own
property for which you pay a tax as rent. He is allowed to do this because
you are presumed by statutory law and the banker to be in bankruptcy. This
fraud is not revealed because he does not have to make an appearance in
court to present and defend his claim. His name is not mentioned in the

Let's say you are not aware of your remedies provided for you within the
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC provides or allows you to dishonor
the county's presentment of the tax bill. You don't pay your tax bill. You,
therefore, just sit on it and don't do or say anything. A couple of years go
by and all of a sudden you are being sent letters to pay up what is owed or
else in a certain period of time, your property will be taken from you and
put up for tax sale.

Now here is what is interesting........ If you don't pay your tax bill and
they contact you asking you to pay it and you don't do it, they will declare
that you are in default. It is based on that default, as provided for in the
UCC, that they sell your property for the tax (rent).

However, the county never goes into court to put into the record the
identification of the real creditor. And the county does not state the true
nature and cause of the action against you (bankruptcy action disguised as a
tax action). Why? Because, under bankruptcy implementation, they have
developed a legal procedure which is based upon your promise to pay. This
procedure provides that they don't have to come to the court to get a court
order authorizing the sale of your property. Therefore, the real creditor
never makes an appearance in court.

The reality is, you are denied any possibility of appearing in court to
exercise your right to challenge the creditor. To ask if he became the
creditor under "public policy." To ask if it is under "public policy", just
what is the "public policy?" And how did you (as an international banker)
become "creditor" to me and everyone else in this country (American people).
They don't want you to ask the real creditor (the International Bankers), to
produce the documents upon which your personal debt is established.

If they were forced to go into court, they would have to produce the deed or
mortgage showing you knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily promised to pay
the corporate public debt. You did not knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily
promise to pay any U.S. Corporate Bankruptcy obligation made in the 1930's.

This would, of course, expose their racket. The fact is, that, there was
absolutely no debt connected to you until you agreed to it through their
deception and fraud. The deception in a broader sense, permeates the
education system and the news media, etc., to sell you on the idea that you
 a statutory "U.S. citizen" and "resident of the United States."


Your property is pledged for the rest of your life upon your signature and
your promise to perform is pledged into perpetual debt. The bankers don't
even bother to go to court They leave it up to the agencies to administer
the agency corporate public policy.

It is the public policy of that agency to bill you on your promise to
perform. If you don't pay, they follow up on the public policy on notice of
default and give you one more chance to pay. Then they proceed to sell the
property at a tax auction. They never go to court or appear in court to back
up their claim against you. Did any of your government licensed and
controlled teachers ever stress that your signature is your most valuable
personal property?

Did your government teachers ever tell you that any time you sign any
document, you should sign it "without prejudice," or with "All R\00\00\EEights
Reserved" above your signature. This means you are reserving your God given
unalienable rights which cannot be transferred and all other rights for
which your forefathers died.

The Corporate U.S.. Government provides, or at best pretends to provide for
this reservation of rights under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 1-207 and
1-103. You need more information in this area.

It is not in the best interest of the United States Corporate "PUBLIC"
schools to teach you about their bankruptcy proceedings and how they have
set the snare to Compel you into paying their debt.

The Corporate "PUBLIC" schools are strictly designed for their Corporate
citizen/subjects. That is. the Corporate U.S.. Public School citizens.

Notice all the emphases on being a "good" Citizen. Basically all their
teachers and their students are trained to produce labor and material in
exchange for valueless green paper called "money." It is not money, it
functions "AS" money.

Lawful money must be backed by something of value. Bankers take your labor,
services, and material (homes, cars, farms, etc.) in exchange for their
valueless corporate paper. This paper is backed only by the "full faith and
Confidence of the United States Government" THE MOTHER CORPORATION.

I do not have faith or confidence in the U.S. BANKRUPT CORPORATE GOVERNMENT
the sovereign American people into their bankruptcy obligations.

Their fraudulent money laundering process promotes your payment on the
corporate government's bankruptcy debt. This debt is mathematically
impossible to pay Off. You and your family are in continual financial
bondage to the international bankers. They love it so!

Black's Law Dictionary 1990, defines "Money Changers" as: of a
banker... today handled by the international departments of banks. "Let me
think for a moment, what did Christ do to the Money Changers?" Oh, yes, he
severely interfered with their activity. Three days later he was crucified.
Lincoln was killed for interfering with the money changers. Kennedy was
slaughtered for interfering with the money changers.

Let's return to the subject of your property, and the tax sale for not
paying property taxes. In this situation under a standard deed (not common
law deed) you are actually in default. Not because you understand the
default or you like being in default, you just are in default of the tax
payment. So they put your property up for sale.

At the tax sale, Joe Doe, average American, bids on your property and gets
it. Now, there is a procedure he must go through step by step to establish.
He is required to give you another chance. You have six months and a day to
pay off the default. If, at this time, you pay off the amount the county
says you owe, plus penalties, interest, fines, etc., then your property is
taken off default status and it is yours to continue to pay taxes on th\00\00\EBe
next year.


There was a deal struck that, if any person who doesn't have a lawyer to
bring a case before the courts, and this person proves the fraud, and speaks
the truth about the fraud, the courts are compelled to not allow the case to
be cited or published anywhere. The courts cannot afford to have the case
freely available in the public archives. This would be evidence of the
fraud. That is why you can't hire an attorney. An attorney is compelled to
uphold the fraud.

"I'm Here To Help You."
"I Have The Governments Permission To Practice Law."
"I'm A Member of the Bar."

The attorney is there for one reason. That reason is to make sure the
bankruptcy scam (established by the corporate public policy of the corporate
Federal Government) is upheld. The lawyer's will cite no cases for you that
will go against the bankruptcy in corporate public policy.

Whatever the lawyers do for you is a bunch of Bull Shit. The lawyers have to
support the bankruptcy and public policy even at your expense. The lawyers
can't go against the corporate Federal Government statutes implementing,
protecting and administrating the bankruptcy.

For all cases cited, those in the US Code or the state annotated code or any
other source, you may be sure that they are only those selected cases that
support the public policy of bankruptcy. The legal system has to work that
way. After the last 30-40-50-60 years of cases after cases having been
decided based upon upholding the bankruptcy, how could the legal system
possibly allow someone to come into court and put in the record substantial
information and argument to prove the fraud?


Can you imagine how damaging it would be, if they allowed your case to be
cited in another case, or if they allowed the public to examine a copy of
your brief that exposes evidence of the fraud?

This exposure would render null and void everything for which they have
worked so hard. Wouldn't this \00\00\DDexposure make the people mad? Wouldn't this
exposure mean there would be blood running in the streets? Especially the
cities where the poor people have been really taken by this diabolical

What they are concerned about is that the case never be cited. That goes
against the bankruptcy for fear of exposing the bankruptcy and the people
will then pick up their guns and shoot the SOB's.


You said you wanted to be a lawyer. Well, I hope you've read this carefully,
because here is the legal system you're headed to serve, and serve you will.
You say you wanted to be a lawyer so you can find out what oath they're
taking, in "secret", behind closed doors in solemn preparation for the
"business of the court" as judges and lawyers.

Now you know the oath. The oath is simply to uphold the bankruptcy. If you
want to be a lawyer and want to make a living as a lawyer, be careful. They
will weed you out at the beginning if you don't bring in your paperwork
under the bankruptcy procedures.

If you try to defend your clients and try to help your clients they will get
rid of you. They will pull your license. So you spent all that money and
time going to school under the guise of helping people and you're wasting
your time. Without a license you can't go into a courtroom. I would think
about this if I were you.


Here is what happens. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the
Lawyers Guild of Great Britain. The American Bar Association is not
connected primarily with what happens in any case on the local level.

However, when a case leaves the local level, by that is meant, the state
court, city court or the justice of the peace, or even the federal court;
and goes to the appeal's court, it would appear that the American Bar
Association takes notice of the case.

It would seem that the American Bar Association must have an agreement that
any action brought on appeal, must be reviewed by the American Bar
Association. If this is true, it would make sense. How else would the
American Bar Association, a branch of the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain,
which is the legal arm of the Rothschild's Dynasty, be able to monitor and
administer the corporate bankruptcy?

It would appear that the American Bar Association would be compelled to
review all appeal cases and to make certain any case brought under common
law or the constitutional law that would expose the bankruptcy, would be
immediately stamped on the back that "this case is not to be cited or

I believe that this is the stamp origin and purpose of the stamp message in
such cases. The justice department may be able to do that in Washington D.C.
I can't see where any judge or lawyer could have the authority to stamp or
label the case as one not to be cited for future cases. I think that is an
official stamp from the American Bar Association.


Now, Mr/Ms. Law Student, if you're still attending classes and you have a
good professor, ask him/her about just where the stamp comes from that
you've seen on many cases. Just who put it on the paperwork and just who
authorized the citation restriction.

Just who is tampering with the law?

There is one thing certain the creditor and or his agents are watching these
cases very carefully. The creditor and his agents must balance their books.
When you think of the IRS, be aware that the IRS is an agent of the
creditor, the corporate International Bankers. This is just one of the
Bankers' state side agencies. The General Accounting Office (GAO) is another
agency they use for this country.

This is where all the accounting goes on to keep track of the debt. All the
states have to send reports to Washington D.C. Washington D.C. has to send
reports to the (GAO).

Take a look at your state Comptroller's Annual Report to the Governor of
your state. I found it in the library located in the city of the corporate
state capital.

Look under "Trust Fund" for each state sub-corporation like the state
courts, IRS, Banks, Education, etc. you will be amazed at the amount of
money being pumped into the Trust Fund from the various Corporate State
Departmental Revenues (all revenue is referred to as taxes: fines, fees,
licenses, etc.).

There are millions and billions of your hard earned worthless federal
reserve notes, "dollars", being held in "trust." This money is being
siphoned off into the coffers of the International Bankers while the
corporate government officials are hounding you for more and more tax

All this accounting system is NOT so the people will know what is going on.
The accounting reports are for the bankers and creditors to keep tabs on
just where their collections are coming from. The bankers want to know if
the bankruptcy debt payments are coming in and just how much and from what
sources. This accounting is the purpose behind M1, M2, M3, M4. and M5. All
this accounting is closely monitored. Maybe every day, but at least once a

These M's are the reports of the amounts of money in circulation. The amount
of debt out there, and the amount of credit out there. The floating of debt
in the form of bonds. There are five different categories. This system had
to come into existence in order for the creditors to be on top of the
bankruptcy at all times. This system allows the creditors to figure out and
know exactly what is going on in their domain.

It all makes sense. Don't the bankers hire bill collectors? Creditors hire
bill collectors to snoop around do see why you're not paying. They want do
know how much you are going to pay so they can figure out how much will be
coming in. How much they will collect. They want to know who will pay and
who won't.



Here is what is going to very quickly happen internationally. All of the
governments around the world are going to unite. They will create one big
giant credit union for collecting the debt for the International Bankers. We
have allowed ourselves do get into this very sad situation, but THAT IS THE

The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill
the world with fools. -- "State Tamperings with Money Banks" -- Herbert
Spencer (1820-1903)


This Page on the Web started Dec 7, 1996, The 55th Anniversary of the
Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, which precipitated the entry of the United
States into World War 2.

IN MEMORIAM of the many Sovereign Citizens in all wars
Who believed they gave their Oath and their Lives to Defend The Constitution
for the United States against all Enemies, Both Foreign and Domestic, In the
Preservation of Liberty and Freedom and Justice for All.

Reproduction of all or any parts of the above text may be used for general
information. This HTML presentation is copyright by Barefoot, December 1\00\00\00996.

Barefoot, 18446 W. Holland Road, Post Falls, ID 83854

Three mighty important things, Pardn'r, LOVE And PEACE and FREEDOM.




"Either you're going to go along with your mind and the truth, or you're
going to yield to fear and custom and conditioned reflexes. With our minds
alone we can discover those principles we need to employ to convert all
humanity to success in a new, harmonious relationship with the universe. We
have the option to make it."

R. Buckminster Fuller, 1895-1983 - Citizens Administration. - Like World Wars? Fight 'Em Yourself. - Inside Covert Operations. - An Option For Success. - Yes! Positive Futures Network. - Understanding Economics. - Home-Made Power. - Counter-Propaganda. - Who's Bribing Who? - Individual & Community Liberty. - Citizens Intelligence Agency. - The Emperor's New Clothes. - Common Sense. - Money: Where's It Come From? - Democratic Confederation Works Best. - Prosperity Without Pollution. - Need Money? Negotiate With These Guys. - Criminal Ignorance Agency. - Defense Intelligence Agency. - Confused But Useful.

Thank you,

Jon Chance
72 Peterborough Street
Boston MA 02215 USA

Monday, November 21, 2016

Liberty And The Police State

     The American police state is just a symptom of much greater woe.  We are bankrupt 10 times over and the opportunistic degradation of our liberty all along the way to that state of affairs is yet another symptom of the same thing.  The illness of course is, simply put, an ingrained and uncaring stupidity, a lackadaisical disresepct for truth, and a sick dependence on TV for mass  information management.

     Yessssss, through manipulation of the currency foreign powers now control our media, our schools, and almost all government via bankrupted then reorganized corporate government services franchises which all have names, like the fbi and the cia and all the other alphabet agencies which basically spell PIG, right down to your local governments.

    Now part of the Global Estate Trust, these reorganizations of our government are never advertised, they are "Closely Held", because they incorporate all the emergency war powers acts and other emergency legislation which occurred in conjunction with.  All together these machinations have been continually used to annihilate the basic purpose of the founding legal documents of this country.   Just a God damned piece of paper indeed.  Fuck you Duhhhhh-bya.

     Its all really a liberty eroding scam via a long term paper money swindle.  The police are tax enforcement and mind control through low level but constant terror/presence on the streets.  Things like the drug war are just the flames which the police and their tv creators constantly fan to keep themselves in jelly donuts and digicams.

     When harassed by the american police state I make sure to comply and even cooperate to the extent the "Law" requires, but I don't have to like it, and I never will.  So now, here in the police state amerikkka, it is not enough to obey the law, we must bow down to the American police state itself, we must LIKE them, HONOR them, or we are labeled malcontents, terrorists even, and singled out, targeted, for lots of special government expenditures.  Whatever these watch dogs do, though, they cannot make my life into something bad, no matter how hard they try. And I will get them, one day,  show the world what pieces of garbage they really are.

     The American police state produces nothing, they are a bleeding of society.  Continual and large scale.  They protect the upper 5% from the largely imagined, tv created, and yes, Paranoid delusions of the poor abused elite.  The drug war is all about making work for zillions of cops, and for keeping prices up, especially on the street.  We have a narco democracy using electronic mind control of monster proportion, whose public relations department and 24/7 apologists are TV and newspaper media.  Its been this way for many decades now.

     Perhaps the next president will convince the American people of the need to vote Libertarian in the future.

    You can catch up with me here, or any of my other blogs:


Thursday, October 20, 2016

The Truth of 911

11872 Words

Chapter 2

911: The New Reich

"I...looked up out of the office window to see what seemed like
perfectly synchronized explosions coming from each after the other, from top to bottom, with a fraction of a second between, the floors blew to pieces." Wall Street Journal reporter John Bussey, describing his observation of the collapse of the south tower from the ninth floor of the WSJ office building.

When asked what effect 911 would have on the Israeli/American relationship, Former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu replied " "It's very good...well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy."

False Flag Operation: Violent terrorism committed for the purpose of directing blame to agencies other than the actual terrorists. Utilized habitually for military perception-management and behavior-modification programs by intelligence apparatus such as the Mossad, KGB, and CIA.

Chillin' Out

Control of the American population through fear and terror has been the prime operating mode of an international elite who have become entrenched here since at least World War One, and more likely, since the Civil War. This devolution of freedom and patriotism has been greatly accelerated since mass media gained ascendancy in America. Media's role in the Cold War, and every war since then, up to and including the War on Terror, is undeniable, and despicable. They don't call it programming for nothing.

Whether most Americans know it or not, the method by which their freedoms have been whittled away is through "Emergency War Powers Acts" which literally suspend the constitution. As mentioned in chapter one, and cannot be over stated, Every American war has had its attendant Emergency War Powers Acts, even the War on Drugs. These decrees are supposed to be rescinded after each so-called emergency, but like the income tax, which was also to be rescinded, have yet to be. Some Emergency War Powers Acts are later superseded by even more intrusive Emergency War Powers Acts.

The Cold War was the greatest fear machine and treasure chest ever created. Like most things viewed in hindsight, it is fairly easy to see now that the Cold War was indeed created for just that purpose, as so much else has been created in this world of hate and strife and torture. The dividing up of Hitler's scientists between the USA and USSR after World War Two is just one clarification in support of the above statement; the Reich has been playing war games with itself, becoming privy to the economic product and facilities of the two largest nations on Earth, while enjoying the benefits of deep deep cover. That means very little accountability, if any. The official secrecy regime here in America began its real takeover of our government at the exact same time the Nazi scientists were being brought in and given positions of power in industry, government, and intelligence operations. These circumstances have evolved into many things, but more than anything they are the foundation of the police state. The New Reich.

War making has always worked well to handle Americans, to direct Americas energies, and more importantly, Americas money. Being the richest country on Earth has its responsibilities, no? And no one wants to lose what they have. These mindsets have led Americans down the garden path, to the slaying table, and in spite of all the promises, and great sacrifice by Americans in general, we now find ourselves in such debt it is not even imaginable how we will be able to extricate ourselves from the parasites grip. The homeless mass grows daily. The veterans go hungry and uncared for, while our common product is pumped out of the country to the tune of many billions of dollars per day. We are living on credit, all of us, according to the same international elite who chameleoned their way into our world, then destroyed it. We have been living like this for a long time.

Once the money was all gone, the debt could proceed as planned, thereby increasing the leverage within our judicial which, also as planned, began eating away at American sovereignty and liberty. The ever mounting debt was used as justification for all this. Its on paper, in many places. Some people saw it all happening, and wrote about it, but by that time the internationalists had almost total control of the media. This is why those same internationalists who foster nazism, fear and hate are in power right now. It is also why they despise the internet and do everything possible to hinder it, to kill it.

Once the Cold War was officially ended, along with any savings America had put aside for things like social security (1) and minor details like that, then the paperwork was complete, making England and some other European interests even MORE the caretakers of our paper, including our social security, and it was time for a rest. 8 years of Bill Clinton was that rest, and the clearing air was such a welcome respite from the holier than thou war making and crusading of the so called conservatives that no one really noticed the lines being sprayed in the sky, or the myriad antennae going up.

So Bill Clinton had his day, then came Americas first appointee. Things were not going too well for the clown from Texas, and his pack of 'murkins (Americans), so his masters, the people who appointed him, decided it was time for act two. This next version of the cold war, act two, was called the War On Terror. During this war for the elite internationalists, Americans would yet again sacrifice their blood and money, but not fighting a largely imagined communist threat; this time the elite's war erupted as a necessity based on oil production in the middle east, and to foster the imperialism of Israel. (2)

The Crash Heard 'Round The World

On the day before 911, September 10th 2001, during testimony before the House Appropriations Committee concerning the Fiscal Year 2002 Defense Budget, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld announced that something like 2.6 trillion dollars had effectively come up missing. This was attributed to Department Of Defense Transactions that could not be accounted for. The Pentagon comptroller at the time, the Rabbi Dov Zakheim, was also at a loss to explain this problem, stating he needed to hire some certified public accountants to help untangle the snarl.

This 2.6 trillion dollar problem became moot less than 24 hours later though. People forgot about many things indeed as they sat mesmerized, watching their televisions, listening to the likes of Ted Koppel droning "No one in the world has ever seen pictures like these before..."

Another well known news correspondent in front of the Pentagon stood with his microphone, the carnage in the background, and stated "We do not have a clue what happened here..."

The most truthful statement of the day, was that.

A large portion of video and audio evidence from that day was quickly hidden away afterwards, but fortunately some folks were awake enough to tape the proceedings from that day, and it will soon be seen that not only has there been a whole lot of lying going on, but in fact the whole show appears to have been concocted beforehand.

The reasons again: 1) to pump American money, equipment, and manpower into the middle east in such quantity it makes the cold war look like a walk in the park; 2) to galvanize America behind the appointee of the internationalists; 3) to cover up a lot of blatant theft by the criminals working for the appointed president, and 4) to deploy some very well hidden but very powerful quantum energy technology within America itself, in the name of defense. That would be Devilvision. The ultimate surveillance system. The ultimate in policing. The ultimate mind control. Perfect.


Immediately after the debacle of 911 occurred, within hours, a "Shadow Government" was formed, appointees of the appointee, and this, like So Much Else, was just something that already existed, and was legitimized while everyone was looking elsewhere. According to CBS (3/2/02) as well as the Washington Post (3/2/02) Key congressional leaders say they didn’t know the appointed president had established this government-in-waiting. Some Congressmen state the administration should have allowed debate concerning its plans. Har. Har. Har.

It did not take long for naziism and its operations to follow in the wake of this modern Reichstag fire called 911. Everything fell into place so easily and with barely a whisper, that most people researching this event begin to see pretty quickly things were all laid out ahead of time, and just waiting for the catalyst. An earlier project of the United States Government, called Project Northwoods, also outlined the use of terror as a means to accomplish exactly what happened on September 11th 2001, except when Northwoods (3) was drafted, in 1962, the foe was Cuba.

Every day, as more people awaken, and more real evidence surfaces, it looks as if terror has been used as an excuse to institute nazi like degradation of our civil rights, and to actually birth the New Reich. It is here that mention should be made of one salient fact, so that confusion does not develop: Israel was Created in 1948 as a National Socialist State, which happens to be the same form of government as Nazi Germany. (3a)

So far the events of 911 have led to a state of permanent war, with America providing the tools, the manpower, and the money. No doubt the perpetrators hope that this is the way thing$ will be in perpetuity, eh heh, world without end, amen.

For the record, some other interesting things that happened on September 10th, 2001, the day before 911: 1) NM Governor Gary Johnson debated the appointees appointed drug czar in Albuquerque NM ( JOHNSON, DEA CHIEF TALK DOPE by Leslie Linthicum, 11 September 2001 Albuquerque Journal); due to the fact that the drug laws here in America are based on special interests and illegal profits, the drug czars stance was of course erroneous and indefensible. His foolishness was manifest, as was the foolishness of his pharmaceutical masters.

Also on September 10, 2001: former President Bush (Sr.) is attending a Carlyle Group business conference with a brother of Osama bin Laden. The conference is interrupted the next day by the attacks. [Washington Post, 3/16/03]. It is also interesting to note that on September 13th through 19th, 2001, members of bin Laden's family are driven or flown under FBI supervision to a secret assembly point in Texas and then to Washington, where they left the country on a private plane when most flights were still grounded. Top White House officials personally approved these evacuations. [New York Times, 9/4/03, Boston Globe, 9/20/01, New York Times, 9/30/01, more]

Again on September 10th 2001: A group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns." [Newsweek, 9/24/01, more]

Dancing Israelis

It is the morning of September 11, 2001, New Jersey. A local woman looks out her window to an astonishing and frightening tableau: the twin towers are burning! She calls her neighbor and they speak in hushed tones, reverent, knowing instinctively that this is the end of something big, and the beginning of something even bigger.

Then, in a park across the street, she notices a large moving van, and there are men outside of it who appear to be celebrating excitedly, filming the event. The woman reports this activity to the local police. Later, five "Middle Eastern men" are picked up, and it becomes evident to an eventual investigator that the moving company is not really a moving company, but a front for Israeli Military Intelligence, Mossad. Dominic Suter, the Israeli owner of Urban Moving Systems, the so-called moving company, escaped to Israel before he could be questioned by the FBI. The five middle eastern men were expediently returned to Israel on visa violations. The assistant attorney general in charge of criminal investigations at the time was Michael Chertoff, also a dual citizen of Israel, who was later promoted to head the Department Of Homeland Security.

It should also be noted at this point that Zim Israeli Navigation, one of the worlds largest sea container moving companies, left the World Trade Center just 5 days before the cataclysm (September 6th 2001), after 30 years occupancy (3). During the time of their departure a great amount of moving was going on, with some observers noting odd loads both leaving and entering the buildings. As one anonymous journalist wrote:
"National Geographic is a spy outfit that does anthropological ground work for neo-libcon colonization and provides opium flavored illusions for the western elite. I doubt that they mentioned that Zim Israeli Navigation packed it up and split the WTC on September 6th after 30 years in the building. Questions. Was their moving company moving out their records of 50 years...or were they moving in 14 tons of high explosives? What tool do movers use to pack boxes?"

There is also a matter of precious metals, lots of precious metals, which seem to have disappeared during this fray, and certain very important legal records were also conveniently destroyed when these, the first three steel-framed buildings EVER, collapsed due to fire. Coincidentally (Or not) this was the first time NORAD, during its 40 + year history, ever failed in its duties of keeping American air space safe and clear.

The third building that fell was WTC7 which had nothing to do with aircraft being flown into it. It did have a secret CIA base inside of it though, and extensive underground facilities. The owner of the building, Larry Silverstein, stated publicly (PBS documentary America Rebuilds) that a decision was made to "Pull" the building on the same day as the other buildings went down. (6) This is noteworthy, and is rather an admission of guilt, seeing as WTC7 was definitely imploded with explosives, by decision, and the explosives were already installed at the time the decision was made. It takes days to set up a demolition, and there are no snap decisions along those lines.

Fly Thee To The Moon
There were many mistakes among the machinators of 911, unless these mistakes were intentional, or simply the result of uncaring attitudes. Perhaps these boondoggles and major inconsistencies are just a measure of disdain for the American people. Are these bloopers because of complacence? A complacence born of ultra-wealth, a feeling of being untouchable, being above the law? Sociologists have a term for that. It is called Elite Deviance, of The Elite Deviant Class. (7) According to that creed, the law is for everyone else, the common people, and does not apply to people with money.

Whether these lapses in reason and planning are the result of high disdain, or plain stupidity, or something in between, it is worthwhile to examine as many facets as possible when in search of the truth concerning 911, the facilitator of the New Reich. One conclusion that has been reached over and over is that a lot of 911 was planned well ahead of time, but was hurriedly put together in response to world events going sour in an accelerated manner. It is thought by some researchers that the time table of 911 was moved up by nearly a year or more in response to dissidence in the public arena. This has made it much easier to spot inconsistencies, so the dissidence was not a total loss after all. If the destruction of the twin towers had happened on their original true schedule, a lot of these loose ends would have been eliminated as a matter of proper planning, and streamlined operations.

Yet another glaring lack of credibility in this saga of destruction and war making is that of Danny Lewin (8), who is shown on the seating chart of flight #11, the first plane to hit the World Trade Center (North Tower). Mr. Lewin was logged as a passenger on this plane. Since 911 it has been discovered that Mr. Lewin was also a Captain in Israel's elite Sayaret Matkal, a counter-terror and assassin team, specializing in "Aircraft takeover". The stewardess on flight 11, Betty Ong, initially identified Daniel Lewin's seat number as the shooter during the supposed hijacking.

The Profit Of 911

Another real truth of this matter is that the World Trade Center in its entirety was the greatest lemon project in history. Not only was special terrorism insurance added just weeks before the incident, but according to various reports by architects and other consultants, the buildings were slowly but steadily becoming unsafe, and the dismantling of the towers was estimated to cost AT LEAST 5 times as much as their construction, because they would have to be dismantled piece by piece. (9)
Several people have referred to 911 as the classic Two Birds With One Stone scenario, whereby bird one, a potential great financial loss was, as if by magic, turned into a windfall, while bird two, America at large, was tricked into believing Islam was the great destroying demon; the latter just happened to fulfill the military invasion requirements of American Multinational corporations in the Middle East, and to aid in a Greater Zion.

The one stone was of course the terror committed on September 11th, 2001. This "Pearl Harbor" like terror on American soil had actually been recommended in the past, and in writing, by none other than Zbigniew Brzezinski (The Grand Chessboard, 1996), and the Rabbi Dov Zakheim, to get America awake and angry over the Islamic threat. In the report "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century" published by none other than The American Enterprise's "Project for a New American Century" (PNAC), System Planning Corporations International Executive Rabbi Dov Zakheim, called for "Some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor" to foster the frame of mind needed for the American public to support a war in the Middle East that would politically and culturally reshape the region."

During his job as a top executive for Systems Planning Corporation, Dov Zakheim helped to market the technology used to take over the controls of an airborne vehicle already in flight. For example, the Flight Termination System technology could reacquire a planes controls from hijackers and bring the plane down safely. The Flight Termination System can be used in conjunction with other technologies and can control up to 8 airborne vehicles simultaneously. Many of the aircraft maneuvers observed during the 911 fiasco exhibited behavior that has made software specialists declare the planes are unable to fly in these configurations, due to software limitations, EXCEPT if the autopilot is commandeered with just such technology. (10)

Dov Zakheim went on to become the Comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001, as an appointee of the appointed president. Zakheim was comptroller during the disappearance of the two and a half trillion dollars which, as stated earlier, was announced publicly on September 10th 2001. He resigned from the Pentagon on April 15th 2004 (The Anniversary of the Roman Conquest of Masada)(11), and from there went to work at Booz, Allen, & Hamilton, one of the most well known strategy consulting firms on the planet. Booz, Allen & Hamilton work closely with DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) the research arm of the Department of Defense.

The Rabbi Dov Zakheim has been credited with many things, and has been described as The Bionic Zionist. He is given credit for obtaining squadrons of F-16 and F-15 aircraft for Israel by having them declared surplus, then sold at a fraction of their true value. (12) Though quite disproportionate to the population, Israel flies one of the largest Air Forces in the world, and that's thanks to Dov Zakheim, who holds not only a top secret security clearance in the United States, but an Israeli passport as well.

The Day Of Wrecking: A Short Official Timeline

September 11, 2001: Warren Buffett, the #2 richest man on Earth [BBC, 6/22/01], hosts a charity event inside Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska. A group of business leaders attend, including at least one who would have died in the WTC conflagration. [SF Business Times, 2/1/02, Forbes 10/15/01] Duhhhhh-bya Bush flies to this same base that day, where there is an underground command center. [CNN, 9/12/01, CBS, 9/11/02]

September 11, 2001: Recovery experts extract data from 32 WTC computer drives revealing a surge in financial transactions. Illegal transfers of over $100 million may have been made through some WTC computer systems immediately before and during the disaster. [Reuters, 12/18/01, CNN, 12/20/01]

September 11, 2001: In what the government describes as a “bizarre coincidence”, The National Reconnaissance Office or NRO, was ready for an exercise at 9 AM on September 11th involving an aircraft crash into one of its buildings near Washington, DC. [AP, 8/22/02] Four other war games were also in progress at the time of the attacks. [C-SPAN Congressional Testimony, 3/11/05]

September 11, 2001:The entire continental United States is defended by only seven air bases and 14 military jets. [CNN, 9/9/03, Newsday, 9/23/01]

Background Information Concerning NORAD: Department of Defense (6/1/01) and FAA (7/12/01) procedure: During a hijacking, the FAA hijack coordinator on duty at Washington headquarters requests the military to provide escort aircraft. Normally, NORAD escort aircraft take the required action. The FAA notifies the National Military Command Center by the most expeditious means. [DOD/, 6/1/01, FAA, 7/12/01, FAA 7/12/01] If NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) is notified of any difficulties in the skies, they begin the work to scramble jet fighters (take off and intercept aircraft that are off course). Between September 2000 and June 2001 fighters were scrambled 67 times. [AP, 8/12/02] When the Lear jet of golfer Payne Stewart failed to answer in 1999, F-16 interceptors were quickly dispatched. According to an Air Force timeline, a series of military planes provided an emergency escort to Payne’s stricken Lear about 20 minutes after ground controllers lost contact with his plane. [Dallas Morning News, 10/26/99]

September 11, 2001:

8:20 AM (approx.): Air traffic controllers aware Flight 11 has been hijacked. [NY Times, 9/15/01]

8:40 AM: NORAD notified of hijacking. [NY Times, 10/16/01, 8:38 AM Washington Post, 9/15/01]

8:46 AM: Flight 11 crashes into the WTC (World Trade Center) north tower. [approximately 26 minutes after controllers lost contact][New York Times, 9/12/01]

8:46 AM: Appointed President Bush later states, "I was sitting outside the classroom and I saw an airplane hit the tower. The TV was on." [CNN, 12/4/01] "When we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building." [White House, 1/5/02] There was no live coverage of the first crash on TV and Appointed President Bush was in a classroom reading with children at the time of the second crash. The name of the book he was reading was “My Pet Goat”, and photos taken during this episode show the appointed resident holding said book upside down. There are connotations of highly irregular sort associated with this happenstance. The reader is encouraged to research this further by searching the keyword Baphomet.

8:52 AM: Two F-15s depart Otis Air Force Base, [Washington Post, 9/15/01] in pursuit of Flight 175. Major General Paul Weaver, director of the Air National Guard, states "the pilots flew like a scalded ape, topping 500 mph but were unable to catch up to the airliner. We had a nine-minute window, and in excess of 100 miles to intercept 175,'' he said. ''There was just literally no way.'' [Dallas Morning News, 9/15/01] F-15's fly at up to 2.5 times the speed of sound [1875 mph or 30+ miles a minute or 270+ miles in nine minutes] and are designed for low-altitude, high-speed, precision attacks. [BBC]

8:56 AM: By this time, it is evident that Flight 77 is lost. The FAA, already in contact with the Pentagon about the two hijackings out of Boston, reportedly doesn’t notify NORAD of this until 9:24, 28 minutes later. [see 9:10 AM for comparison, New York Times, 10/16/01]

9:03 AM: Flight 175 crashes into the south WTC tower. [23 minutes after NORAD notified, 43 minutes after air traffic control lost contact with pilots][New York Times, 9/12/01, CNN, 9/12/01]

9:10 AM: Major General Paul Weaver states Flight 77 came back on the (radar) scope at 9:10 in West Virginia. [Dallas Morning News, 9/15/01] Another report states the military was notified of Flight 77 several minutes after 9:03. [Washington Post, 9/15/01]

9:24 AM (Approximate): The FAA, who 28 minutes earlier had discovered Flight 77 off course and heading east over West Virginia, reportedly notifies NORAD. A Pentagon spokesman says, "The Pentagon was simply not aware that this aircraft was coming our way." [Newsday, 9/23/01, New York Times, 10/16/01] Yet since the first crash, military officials in a Pentagon command center were urgently talking to law enforcement and air traffic control officials about what to do. [New York Times, 9/15/01]

9:28 AM: Air traffic control learns that Flight 93 has been hijacked. [MSNBC, 7/30/02]

9:38 AM: According to news accounts, Flight 77 crashes into the Pentagon. [42 minutes or more after contact was lost, one hour after NORAD notification of first hijacking][New York Times, 10/16/01, 9:43 CNN, 9/12/01]

9:59 AM: The south tower of the World Trade Center collapses. The first ever steel frame building to collapse due to fire. [New York Times, 9/12/01]

10:10 AM: According to news accounts Flight 93 crashes in Pennsylvania. [42 minutes after contact was lost, 90 minutes after NORAD notification of first hijacking. [CNN, 9/12/02]

10:28 AM: The World Trade Center north tower collapses. The second steel frame building in world history to collapse due to fire. [CNN, 9/12/01, NY Times, 9/12/01]

5:20 PM: Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapses. The third and final steel frame building in history to collapse due to fire. [CNN, 9/12/01]

September 11, 2001: Six air traffic controllers who dealt with two of the hijacked airliners make a tape recording describing the events, but the tape is later destroyed by a supervisor without anyone making a transcript or even listening to it. [Washington Post, 5/6/04, New York Times, 5/6/04]

September 11, 2001: A National Public Radio correspondent states: "I spoke with Congressman Ike Skelton who said that just recently the director of the CIA warned that there could be an attack – an imminent attack – on the United States of this nature. So this is not entirely unexpected." [NPR, 9/11/01]

September 11, 2001: Marvin Bush, younger brother of the appointed president, sat on the board of directors of a company called Securacom (now Stratesec) that was responsible for providing "electronic security" to the World Trade Center, right up to 9/11/2001. The company is backed by the Kuwait-American Corp., an investment firm with links to the Bush family.(13)

September 11, 2001: John O'Neill, former FBI Counter terrorism expert, and outspoken critic of White House and corporate oil-interest obstructionism concerning the bin Laden investigation, reports to the World Trade Center for his first day of work, and is killed in the carnage.

The Missing Israeli

At any given time one could expect roughly 45,000 people working at or around the World Trade Centers, while they existed. The day after 911 the Jerusalem Post (14) stated that 4000 Israelis were missing from around the WTC and Pentagon sites, and that is a fair, though perhaps slightly low, estimate of the number of Israelis one could expect to be working in those areas at any given time. The Israeli involvement in the United States government, banking, and finance is well known. Two of the richest firms in New York on September 11th 2001 were Goldman-Sachs and the Solomon Brothers; both firms had offices in the Twin Towers, and many executives in these firms regularly commuted back and forth to Israel. New York is the center of world wide Israeli financial power and the World Trade Center was the core. One should expect that the Israeli death toll was horrendous. For some reason, this was not so. Not so at all.

According to the The New York Times Article THE TALLY, on September 22, 2001:

Officials Say Number of Those Still Missing May Be Overstated

...interviews with many consulate officials yesterday suggested that the lists of people they were collecting varied widely in their usefulness. For example, the city had somehow received reports of many Israelis feared missing at the site, and President Bush in his address to the country on Thursday night mentioned that about 130 Israelis had died in the attacks. But today, Alon Pinkas, Israel's consul general here, said that lists of the missing included reports from people who had called in because, for instance, relatives in New York had not returned their phone calls from Israel. There were, in fact, only three Israelis who had been confirmed as dead: two on the planes and another who had been visiting the towers on business and who was identified and buried."

That’s right. According to records made since the disaster, only one Israeli died in the World Trade Center Destruction, a visitor, and none at the Pentagon. Two supposedly died on the planes used to commit the crime, and we know now that at least one of those was Daniel Lewin, an agent of the Israeli government, a member of an elite counter-terrorism and assassination squad. Pray tell.

To further thicken this plot, an instant messaging service located two blocks from the World Trade Centers, known as Odigo, has been discovered to be complicit in Israeli foreknowledge of the WTC disaster. This connection and evidence of foreknowledge was covered briefly in American media then quickly buried, like so much else. At least two Israel-based employees of Odigo received warnings of an attack in New York city two hours prior to the destruction of the twin towers. Several weeks later Alex Diamandis, vice president of the message service, reportedly stated, "It was possible that the attack warning was broadcast to other Odigo members, but the company has not received reports of other recipients of the message." The senders address was reported to the FBI, and the FBI is supposedly still investigating the matter. Like many Israeli software companies Odigo is based in Herzliya, Israel, a suburb of Tel Aviv, also where Mossad headquarters are located.(15)

The Game

There were many military exercises going on in conjunction with the 911 disaster, and Vice President Dick Cheneys name appears over and over. (16) The appointee Vice President Richard Cheney actually took control of NORAD 3 months prior to 911 ( which is another first for this administration of appointed officials and their lackeys. Norman Mineta (Secretary of Transportation ) Testified in front of the 911 Commission stating that he personally witnessed Dick Cheney in the Presidential Emergency operating center (at NORAD) tracking Flight 77 for many miles before it hit the Pentagon.

Demolition and Dirty Bombs

The destruction of the world trade centers amounted to nothing so much as a dirty bomb. Many of the emergency personnel are suffering the effects of this now, as well as locals in the vicinity of the destruction. The amount of dust and other materials still airborne in the area are monstrous.

This is all made worse by the fact that certain very indicative chemical signatures have become evident to investigators, indicating either an unlikely (Impossible) rogue fission process, or the actual use of micro-nuclear devices in the destruction of the world trade center buildings. (17) Numerous observations along with the discovery of molten steel weeks later, plus video proof, provide further evidence to this theory.

In the aftermath of the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings, a team of scientists from the US Geological Survey collected samples of dust from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan, detritus of the huge pyroclastic dust cloud that enveloped the entire city on September 11th 2001. In these dust samples, the investigators found high levels of chemical elements that were highly irregular, to say the least. Some very rare and toxic elements such as Strontium, Thorium, Lanthanum and Yttrium whose concentrations in the dust samples were related to each other in significant relationships, indicating the likelihood of nuclear device detonations in the recent and immediate area. It should be mentioned that the worlds foremost manufacturers of Micro-nuclear devices is the National Socialist State of Israel.

Pix Of Micronuke micronukesadm2 copy.jpg

According to the report by The Sierra Club "Pollution and Deception at Ground Zero" people were told to clean up the dust themselves. No special precautions were necessary, the EPA continuously assured them. Specialist cleanup contractors were rarely used. Thousands of people have been needlessly and callously exposed.

The cleanup of the World Trade Center debris was hurriedly accomplished prior to any on site investigations or analysis. The clean up was done, coincidentally, or not, by the same company who handled the demolished remnants of the Murrah Federal building in Oklahoma City, where most of the Gulf War I medical records were stored, then destroyed in that particular holocaust (17a). The name of that cleanup company is Controlled Demolition Incorporated (CDI). (18)

The debris and salvaged materials from the World Trade Center were quickly disposed of by shipping overseas or otherwise recycling, well before any inspections could take place. Some of the debris collected by locals has been analyzed chemically though, and quite a few indicate probable high power and very exotic explosives.

The type of dust clouds usually created during controlled demolitions can be seen in videos of the demolition of Seattle's Kingdome and the Reading Grain Facility. When those videos are compared with photos and videos of the Twin Towers falling, the dust clouds of the World Trade Center buildings are extremely indicative of controlled demolition, and are even bigger.

The Pentagonal Cruise Missile

Most people are in agreement about one thing concerning the events of September 11th 2001, and this includes even the meanest and most dull witted adherents to the party line. No one seems to be able to swallow the evidence concerning a commercial passenger aircraft hitting the Pentagon. Many believe that what hit the Pentagon was a remote controlled Cruise Missile. The eyewitness reports lend credence to this as well as the damage caused by the collision. Several reports state that light poles were knocked down by the craft as it made its maneuvers before striking an unoccupied part of the pentagon. One of these light poles landed across the hood of a Taxicab, creating a comical scene and an unforgettable picture.

New Testaments

Many surviving emergency personnel who experienced the 911 event up close and personal, in their face, made verbal and written records immediately following their experience. Most of these were censored heavily by the officials above them, indicating complicity, premeditation, and more. These oral histories tend to indicate, over and over, a controlled demolition, versus an act of overt terrorism by Islam. No doubt that is why they have remained hidden and unreported by the fascist media here. Below the reader will find several pertinent and interesting excerpts from the oral histories provided by 503 firefighters, law enforcement, and medical workers on 911. Although these documents were recorded by the Fire Department of New York (FDNY) at the end of 2001, they were not publicly released until August 12, 2005, and that is because the city of New York would not release them until it was forced to. (20)

Early in 2002, the New York Times requested copies of these histories under the freedom of information act, but the administration of Mayor Michael Bloomberg refused. So the Times, along with several families of 9/11 victims, filed suit. After an arduous and time consuming process the city was finally ordered by the New York Court of Appeals to release the records (with some exceptions and redactions allowed). The Times then made these oral histories publicly available.

"I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?"
--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory

"It was like a professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."
--Paramedic Daniel Rivera

Firefighter Louie Cacchioli, after entering the north tower lobby and seeing elevator doors completely blown out and people being hit with debris, asked himself, "how could this be happening so quickly if a plane hit way above?" After he reached the 24th floor, he and another fireman "heard this huge explosion that sounded like a bomb [and] knocked off the lights and stalled the elevator." After they pried themselves out of the elevator, "another huge explosion like the first one hits. This one hits about two minutes later...[and] I'm thinking, Oh My God, these bastards put bombs in here like they did in 1993!'"

Multiple explosions were also reported by Teresa Veliz, who worked for a software development company in the north tower. She was on the 47th floor, she reported, when suddenly "the whole building shook...[Shortly thereafter] the building shook again, this time even more violently." Then, while Veliz was making her way downstairs and outside: "There were
explosions going off everywhere. I was convinced that there were bombs planted all over the place and someone was sitting at a control panel pushing detonator buttons...There was another explosion. And another. I didn't know where to run."

Steve Evans, a New York-based correspondent for the BBC, said: "I was at the base of the second tower...that was hit...There was an explosion...The base of the building shook...Then there was a series of explosions."

Sue Keane, an officer in the New Jersey Fire Police Department who was previously a sergeant in the U.S. Army, said in her account of the onset of the collapse of the south tower: "It sounded like bombs going off. That's when the explosions happened...I knew something was going to happen... It started to get dark, then all of a sudden there was this massive explosion." Then, discussing her experiences during the collapse of the
north tower, she said: "[There was] another explosion. That sent me and the two firefighters down the stairs...I can't tell you how many times I got banged around. Each one of those explosions picked me up and threw me... There was another explosion, and I got thrown with two firefighters out onto the street."

Lieutenant James Walsh said: "The [north tower] didn't fall the way you would think tall buildings would fall. Pretty much it looked like it imploded on itself."

Assistant Commissioner Stephen Gregory said: "I thought... before...number 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes... Lieutenant Evangelista...asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I...saw a flash flash flash...[at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw."

Captain Karin Deshore said: "Somewhere around the middle of the World Trade Center, there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building."

Firefighter Richard Banaciski, speaking of the south tower said: "[T]here was just an explosion. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions."

Deputy Commissioner Thomas Fitzpatrick said: "We looked up at the [south tower]... All we saw was a puff of smoke coming from about 2 thirds of the way up...It looked like sparkling around one specific layer of the building...My initial reaction was that this was exactly the way it looks when they show you those implosions on TV."

Captain Jay Swithers said: "I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion."

Firefighter James Curran said: "When I got underneath the north bridge I looked back and...I heard like every floor went chu-chu-chu. Looked back and from the pressure everything was getting blown out of the floors before it actually collapsed."

Battalion Chief Brian Dixon said: "I was... hearing a noise and looking up...[T]he lowest floor of fire in the south tower actually looked like someone had planted explosives around it because...everything blew out on the one floor. I thought, geez, this looks like an explosion up there, it blew out."

Firefighter Stephen Viola said: "You heard like loud booms...and then we got covered with rubble and dust, and I thought we'd actually fallen through the floor...because it was so dark you couldn't see anything."

Paramedic Louis Cook said that after the debris started falling, "everything went black" and "you couldn't breathe because [of] all the dust. There was just an incredible amount of dust and smoke." He then found that there was, "without exaggerating, a foot and a half of dust on [his] car."

Battalion Chief Dominick DeRubbio, speaking of the collapse of the south tower, said: "It was weird how it started to come down. It looked like it was a timed explosion."

Firefighter Kenneth Rogers said: "[T]here was an explosion in the south tower...I kept watching. Floor after floor after floor. One floor under another after another and when it hit about the fifth floor, I figured it was a bomb, because it looked like a synchronized deliberate kind of thing."

Firefighter Christopher Fenyo, describing events that occurred after the first collapse, said: "At that point, a debate began to rage because...many people had felt that possibly explosives had taken out 2 World Trade, and officers were gathering companies together and the officers were debating whether or not to go immediately back in or to see what was going
to happen with 1 World Trade at that point. The debate ended pretty quickly because 1 World Trade came down."

The Oil Connection

"In 1953, Bush got money from Brown Brothers Harriman and, with partners Hugh and Bill Liedtke, formed Zapata Petroleum. By the late 1950s they were millionaires. Bush bought subsidiary Zapata offshore from his partners and went into business on his own in 1954. By 1958, the new company was drilling on the Cay Sal Bank in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico. These islands had been leased to Nixon supporter and CIA contractor Howard Hughes the previous year and were later used as a base for CIA raids on Cuba. The CIA was using companies like Zapata to stage and supply secret missions attacking Fidel Castro's Cuban government in advance of the Bay of Pigs invasion. The CIA's code name for that invasion was "Operation Zapata." In 1981, all Securities and
Exchange Commission filings for Zapata offshore between 1960 and 1966 were destroyed. In other words, the year Bush became vice president, important records detailing his years at his drilling company disappeared. In 1969, Zapata bought the United Fruit Company of Boston, another company with strong CIA connections." (21)

A short timeline to show some of the connections of petroleum Interests to 911:

June 27, 2001: India and Pakistan Discuss Building Pipeline Project Through Iran The Wall Street Journal reported that Pakistan and India had entered into discussions about building a gas pipeline from Central Asian gas fields through Iran to overcome the problems of building the pipeline through Afghanistan. Iran had been secretly supporting the Northern Alliance to keep Afghanistan divided so no pipelines could be put through it. [Wall Street Journal, 6/27/2001]

July 21, 2001: US Official Threatens Possible Military Action Against Taliban by October if Pipeline Is Not Pursued. [Source: Calcutta Telegraph -- Three former American officials, Tom Simons (former US Ambassador to Pakistan), Karl Inderfurth (former Deputy Secretary of State for South Asian Affairs), and Lee Coldren (former State Department expert on South Asia) met with Pakistani and Russian intelligence officers in a Berlin hotel. [Salon, 8/16/2002] This is the third of a series of back-channel conferences called "brainstorming on Afghanistan." Taliban representatives sat in on previous meetings, but boycotted this one due to worsening tensions. However, the Pakistani ISI relays information from the meeting to the Taliban. [Guardian, 9/22/2001] At the meeting, Coldren passes on a message from Bush officials. He later states, "I think there was some discussion of the fact that the United States was so disgusted with the Taliban that they might be considering some military action." [Guardian, 9/26/2001] Accounts vary, but former Pakistani Foreign Secretary Niaz Naik later says he is told by senior American officials at the meeting that military action to overthrow the Taliban in Afghanistan is planned to "take place before the snows started falling in Afghanistan, by the middle of October at the latest." The goal is to kill or capture both bin Laden and Taliban leader Mullah Omar, topple the Taliban regime, and install a transitional government of moderate Afghans in its place. Uzbekistan and Russia would also participate. Naik also said, "It was doubtful that Washington would drop its plan even if bin Laden were to be surrendered immediately by the Taliban." [BBC, 9/18/2001] One specific threat made at this meeting is that the Taliban can choose between "carpets of bombs, an invasion, or carpets of gold, and the pipeline." [Brisard and Dasquie, 2002, pp. 43] Naik contends that Tom Simons made the carpets statement. Simons claims, It is possible that a mischievous American participant, after several drinks, may have thought it smart to evoke gold carpets and carpet bombs. Even Americans can't resist the temptation to be mischievous. Naik and the other American participants deny that the pipeline was an issue at the meeting. [Salon, 8/16/2002]

August 2, 2001: US Official Secretly Meets Taliban Ambassador in Last Attempt to Secure Pipeline Deal. Christina Rocca, Director of Asian Affairs at the State Department, secretly meets the Taliban ambassador in Islamabad, apparently in a last ditch attempt to secure a pipeline deal. Rocca was previously in charge of contacts with Islamic guerrilla groups at the CIA, and oversaw the delivery of Stinger missiles to Afghan Mujaheddin in the 1980s. [Irish Times, 11/19/2001; Brisard and Dasquie, 2002, pp. 45; Salon, 2/8/2002]

August 2-3, 2001: Taliban Official Predicts US Will Invade Afghanistan by Mid-October, Possibly in Response to Major Attack Inside US. A senior official in the Talibans defense ministry tells journalist Hamid Mir that the US will soon invade Afghanistan. Mir will later recall that he is told, "[W]e believe Americans are going to invade Afghanistan and they will do this before October 15, 2001, and justification for this would be either one of two options: Taliban got control of Afghanistan or a big major attack against American interests either inside America or elsewhere in the world." Mir reports this information before 9/11, presumably in the newspaper in Pakistan that he works for. [Bergen, 2006, pp. 287] Interestingly, Afghan warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar made a similar prediction to Mir several months before (see April 2001). Also, several weeks earlier, US officials reportedly passed word to Taliban officials in a back channel meeting that the US may soon attack Afghanistan if the Taliban do not cooperate on building an oil and gas pipeline running through the country. According to one participant in the meeting, the US attack would take place "by the middle of October at the latest" (see July 21, 2001).

September 11, 2001: The 9/11 Attack: 3,000 Die in New York City and Washington, D.C. Four planes are hijacked, two crash into the WTC, one into the Pentagon, and one crashes into the Pennsylvania countryside. Nearly 3,000 people are killed.

October 5, 2001: Study Reveals Significant Oil and Gas Deposits in Afghanistan. Contrary to popular belief, Afghanistan has significant oil and gas deposits. During the Soviets' decade-long occupation of Afghanistan, Moscow estimated Afghanistan's proven and probable natural gas reserves at around five trillion cubic feet and production reached 275 million cubic feet per day in the mid-1970s. Nonstop war since has prevented further exploitation. [Asia Times, 10/5/2001] A later article suggests that the country may also have as much copper as Chile, the world's largest producer, and significant deposits of coal, emeralds, tungsten, lead, zinc, uranium ore, and more. Estimates of Afghanistan's natural wealth may even be understated, because surveys were conducted decades ago, using less-advanced methods and covering limited territory. [Houston Chronicle, 12/23/2001]

October 9, 2001: Afghan Pipeline Idea Is Revived. US Ambassador Wendy Chamberlin meets with the Pakistani oil minister. She is briefed on the gas pipeline project from Turkmenistan, across Afghanistan, to Pakistan, which appears to be revived "in view of recent geopolitical developments" -- in other words, the 9/11 attacks. [Frontier Post, 10/10/2001]

December 2, 2001: Enron Files for Bankruptcy. Enron, the largest contributor to the 2000 Bush Presidential Campaign (21a), files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the largest bankruptcy in history up to that date. [BBC, 1/10/2002] In 2002 Enron will reorganize as a pipeline company and will continue working on its controversial Dabhol power plant. [Houston Business Journal, 3/15/2002]

December 8, 2001: US Oil Companies to Invest $200 Billion in Kazakhstan. During a visit to Kazakhstan in Central Asia, Secretary of State Powell states that US oil companies are likely to invest $200 billion in Kazakhstan alone in the next five to ten years. [New York Times, 12/15/2001]

December 22, 2001: Karzai Assumes Power in Afghanistan. Afghan Prime Minister Hamid Karzai and his transitional government assume power in Afghanistan. It was reported a few weeks before that he had been a paid consultant for Unocal at one time (Karzai and Unocal both deny this), as well as Deputy Foreign Minister for the Taliban. [Le Monde (Paris), 12/13/2001; CNN, 12/22/2001]

Mid-July 2001: John O'Neill Rails Against White House and Saudi Obstructionism. FBI counter terrorism expert John O'Neill privately discusses White House obstruction in his bin Laden investigation. O'Neill says, "The main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism were US oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it. He adds, "All the answers, everything needed to dismantle Osama bin Laden's organization, can be found in Saudi Arabia. O'Neill also believes the White House is obstructing his investigation of bin Laden because they are still keeping the idea of a pipeline deal with the Taliban open (see July 21, 2001). [Irish Times, 11/19/2001; Brisard and Dasquie, 2002, pp. xxix; CNN, 1/8/2002; CNN, 1/9/2002]

January 1, 2002: Ex-Unocal Employee Becomes US Special Envoy to Afghanistan. Zalmay Khalilzad, already Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Gulf, Southwest Asia and Other Regional Issues, and a prominent neo-conservative (see May 23, 2001), is appointed by Bush as a special envoy to Afghanistan. [BBC, 1/1/2002] In his former role as Unocal adviser, Khalilzad participated in negotiations with the Taliban to build a pipeline through Afghanistan. He also wrote op-eds in the Washington Post in 1997 (see October 7, 1996) supporting the Taliban regime, back when Unocal was hoping to work with the Taliban. [Independent, 1/10/2002] He will be appointed US ambassador to Afghanistan in 2003 (see November 2003).

February 9, 2002: Pakistani and Afghan Leaders Revive Afghanistan Pipeline Idea. Pakistani President Musharraf and Afghan leader Hamid Karzai announce their agreement to "cooperate in all spheres of activity" including the proposed Central Asian pipeline, which they call "in the interest of both countries." [Irish Times, 2/9/2002; Gulf News, 9/2/2002]

February 14, 2002: US Military Bases Line Afghan Pipeline Route. The Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv notes: "If one looks at the map of the big American bases created [in the Afghan war], one is struck by the fact that they are completely identical to the route of the projected oil pipeline to the Indian Ocean." Ma'ariv also states, "Osama bin Laden did not comprehend that his actions serve American interests. If I were a believer in conspiracy theory, I would think that bin Laden is an American agent. Not being one I can only wonder at the coincidence." [Chicago Tribune, 3/18/2002]

May 30, 2002: Afghan, Turkmen, and Pakistani Leaders Sign Pipeline Deal. [Source: Associated Press]Afghanistan's interim leader, Hamid Karzai, Turkmenistan's President Niyazov, and Pakistani President Musharraf meet in Islamabad and sign a memorandum of understanding on the trans-Afghanistan gas pipeline project. [Dawn (Karachi), 5/31/2002; Alexander's Gas & Oil Connections, 6/8/2002] Afghan leader Hamid Karzai (who formerly worked for Unocal) calls Unocal the "lead company" in building the pipeline. [BBC, 5/13/2002] The Los Angeles Times comments, "To some here, it looked like the fix was in for Unocal when President Bush named a former Unocal consultant, Zalmay Khalilzad, as his special envoy to Afghanistan late last year." [Los Angeles Times, 5/30/2002] Unocal claims that it has no interest in any Afghanistan pipeline after 9/11, but Afghan officials say that Unocal will be the lead company in funding the pipeline. The Afghan deputy minister of mines comments on Unocal's supposed disinterest: "Business has its secrets and mysteries. Maybe they don't want it to be disclosed in the media." [Toronto Star, 3/2/2003]

July 16, 2002: Blair Claims Attack on Afghanistan Only Possible After 9/11. British Prime Minister Tony Blair states, "We knew about al-Qaeda for a long time. They were committing terrorist acts, they were planning, they were organizing. Everybody knew, we all knew, that Afghanistan was a failed state living on drugs and terror. We did not act. To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11." [London Times, 7/17/2002] In a book released one month later, Clinton's former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger will similarly state, "You show me one reporter, one commentator, one member of Congress who thought we should invade Afghanistan before September 11 and I'll buy you dinner in the best restaurant in New York City." [Miller, Stone, and Mitchell, 2002, pp. 219]

November 1, 2002: Caspian Oil Potential Was Wildly Overestimated. Steven Mann, Director of the State Department's Caspian Basin Energy Policy Office, points out that the Caspian Sea nations contain 50 billion barrels of proven oil reserves. [Associated Press, 11/1/2002] "Caspian oil represents four percent of the world reserves. It will never dominate the world markets, but it will have an important role to play," said Mann. He concludes that the Caspian Sea energy "will not be a second Persian Gulf." [Associated Press, 11/1/2002] In late 1995, the American Petroleum Institute asserted that the states bordering the Caspian Sea contained 659 billion barrels of oil (see December 1995).

December 27, 2002: Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Turkmenistan Agree on Building Pipeline. Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Turkmenistan reach an agreement in principle to build the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline, a $3.2 billion project that has been delayed for many years. Skeptics say the project would require an indefinite foreign military presence in Afghanistan. [BBC, 5/30/2002; Associated Press, 12/26/2002; BBC, 12/27/2002] As of mid-2004, construction has yet to begin.

January 18, 2005: Plans for a Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline Continue. The US ambassador to Turkmenistan states that US companies might join a long-delayed trans-Afghan natural gas pipeline project. The Turkmenistan government says a feasibility study for the $3.5 billion pipeline is complete and construction will begin in 2006. The project's main sponsor is the Asian Development Bank. The pipeline is to run from Turkmenistan through Herat and Kandahar in Afghanistan, through the Pakistani cities of Quetta and Multan, and on to India. [Associated Press, 1/18/2005] However, in August 2005 it will be reported that security concerns are still causing delays in approval of the project. A NATO representative will say, "People here are able to see what the Iraqi insurgency can do despite the presence of 150,000 foreign troops. Why not do the same in Afghanistan?" [Sydney Morning Herald, 8/25/2005]

Commissioned To Lie

The 911 Commission, though an official board of inquiry, was put in place to blur all the unpleasant particulars that were bound to, and have, cropped up since that fateful day. The main line of reasoning that has to be adhered to as far as the appointed president and his appointees are concerned is that Islam, via Al-Qaeda, was responsible for the deed on September 11th 2001. That reasoning is a stark necessity, no matter how absurd it has become, because all the war making and fear mongering committed by this gang of elite deviants hinges on that premise.

The Executive Director of the 911 commission, Philip D. Zelikow, a toady of Condoleeza Rice, was uncaring and blatant in his Zionism, which amounts to nothing so much as a fornication of church and state. His will was foremost during the proceedings of the 911 commission, as is standard operating procedure in situations such as these, and his will prevailed overall.

According to the book by Philip Shenon entitled "The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation", Zelikow had such an ornery and abrasive personality that even Henry Kissinger avoided him. That is saying quite a lot right there. From the book: “Zelikow...had...[an] outsize ego and fierce temper; his anger was a thing to behold, his face growing bright red, his well chosen insults flying in every direction.” (21)

This Report was "to provide the fullest possible account of the events surrounding 9/11". We must wonder why it doesn't include any of the testimony from the 9/11 oral histories which suggest controlled demolition. The reason can't be that the Commission didn't know about the oral histories. Although "the city also initially refused access to the records to investigators from the 9/11 Commission," Jim Dwyer of the New York
Times explains, it "relented when legal action was threatened." (21)

So the Commission could have, nay, should have, discussed the testimonies about explosions witnessed by the myriad emergency personnel. In order to help educate the public, the commission could also have requested some of the firefighters and medical workers to give their testimony during one of the Commission's public hearings, but it passed on that opportunity as well.
Some may wonder why more of the emergency personnel are not speaking out. Part of the reason is suggested by Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac, who has gone on record saying: "There were definitely bombs in those buildings," while also saying "many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they're afraid for their jobs to admit it because the 'higher-ups' forbid discussion of this fact."

Even those who threw caution to the wind in an effort to clear their conscience, and to inform the world of important facts, were ill-received and generally ignored. Telling their story to the Commission was no guarantee that it would get into the final report, as discovered by one fireman who made the effort. Firefighter Louie Cacchioli testified in 2004 to members of the Commission's staff. He reported: "I felt like I was being put on trial in a court room," said Cacchioli. "They were trying to twist my words and make the story fit only what they wanted to hear. All I wanted to do was tell the truth and when they wouldn't let me do that, I walked out."

Cacchioli was not alone either. Janitor William Rodriguez, who was invited to the White House as a National Hero for his rescue efforts on 9/11, said he was treated quite differently by the 911 Commission: "I met with the 9/11 Commission behind closed doors and they essentially discounted everything I said regarding the use of explosives to bring down the north tower."

When reading The 9/11 Commission Report, one will not find any references at all to explosions in the towers. This gives the appearance that the Commission deliberately withheld this information, as it seems to have done concerning Able Danger, and many other details that should have been included in "the fullest possible account of the events surrounding 9/11", but were not.

A more detailed and technical report on the 911 event was to be prepared by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Rodriguez stated this group was just as hostile to his testimony: "I contacted NIST . . . four times without a response. Finally, [at a public hearing] I asked them before they came up with their conclusion...if they ever considered my statements or the statements of any of the other survivors who heard the explosions. They just stared at me with blank faces." The Nist report also makes no mention of explosions, or other indications that this act on September 11th, 2001 was a controlled demolition. Anything indicating such bothersome details has been pointedly ignored throughout any official inquiry of 911.

Mr. Zelikow and his commission were in place to do one thing, and one thing only: they were to make sure, at all costs, the officially concocted story was what actually became written down in the history books. In a classic example of passing the buck, the most noteworthy comment made by the 911 commission, as reported by The Washington Post on August 2, 2006:

...Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate. Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according
to several commission sources...In the end, the panel agreed to a compromise, turning over the allegations to the Inspectors General for the Defense and Transportation departments, who can make criminal referrals if they believe they are warranted...”

After his service on the 911 Commission, Zelikow became Counselor to the U.S. Secretary of State, Condoleeza Rice.

The 911 commission
Commission Members
Thomas H. Kean

Lee H. Hamilton
Vice Chair

Richard Ben-Veniste
Fred F. Fielding
Jamie S. Gorelick
Slade Gorton
Bob Kerrey
John F. Lehman
Timothy J. Roemer
James R. Thompson
The Commission closed August 21, 2004.
Commission Staff
Philip D. Zelikow
Executive Director
Chris Kojm
Deputy Executive Director
Daniel Marcus
General Counsel

To The Stocks!

What would a study of 911 be without mention of the stock scandal? The truth behind the selling short of certain stocks in anticipation of 911 is convoluted and still not complete. Like all the other criminals in the appointed presidents administration, the only thing that has happened to people who have gotten caught stealing these watermelons is a slap on the hand, which in duh-byas world is sometimes indiscernible from a pat on the back, as with A. B. "Buzzy" Krongard, who chaired the firm Deutsche Bank-A.B.Brown until 1997. Most of these 911 short transactions showing foreknowledge of the terrorism of 911 were handled by this firm which Mr. Krongard had close ties to, and yes, this is the same Buzzy Krongard who later became executive director of the CIA. Also the same Buzzy Krongard involved heavily with the mercenary army Blackwater Corporation. (23)

Between August 26 and September 11, 2001, certain people identified by the American Securities and Exchange Commission simply as Israeli citizens (24), sold “short” a list of 38 stocks that would more than likely fall drastically in value after the generally unknown but pending terror attacks. The earliest of these transactions was said to take place three weeks or so before 911, which of course means these super-unknown stock dealers had inside knowledge of future events, and also that they made big big bucks from this knowledge.

The crux of the matter is this: these stock deals are concrete evidence of prior knowledge, though many of the deals have been kept secret by the SEC and others, in what can only be called a criminal coverup. Some of these speculators operated out of the Toronto, Canada and Frankfurt, Germany stock exchanges and their profits were specifically stated to be in the millions of dollars, though some of this prize money has gone unclaimed, no doubt to keep the identity of the dealers hidden.

Volumes have been written about the 911 stock scandals, for the interested reader to peruse, pursue, and puke over. Suffice it to say that this is just another nail in the coffin of Liberty, and proof positive that the inventors of Americas demise occupy positions of power, prestige, and respect.

The Ax of 911

To round out this accounting of the 911 show we will quickly cover the anthrax attacks that followed in the wake of the calamity like a very ill wind. It seems certain people were expected to squawk over the grave of the World trade centers, and their dead, and all the things that became covered up and buried in the wreckage and debris. Certain of these people were targeted with mailings of a deadly weaponized strain of anthrax which was specially prepared so that when the person opened the envelope, a static charge would disperse the anthrax spores, allowing them to be inhaled. This proved deadly in 5 instances.

Francis A. Boyle worked under the first Bush Administration as a bioweapons advisor in the 1980s. He says he believes the anthrax mailings were an attack cooked up by the rogues within our intelligence apparatus, to help create a police state by killing off and/or intimidating opposition to anti-terror legislation like the USA PATRIOT Act and the later Military Commissions Act.

"After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the Bush Administration tried to ram the USA PATRIOT Act through Congress," Boyle said in a radio interview with Austin-based talk-show host Alex Jones. "That would have set up a police state."

Senators Tom Daschle (D-South Dakota) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) were opposing the legislation, because they were reading between the lines. Then came the anthrax attacks. Both senators received letters with anthrax, but were lucky enough to survive. Their resistance and support evaporated after these murder attempts though, and the Patriot Act was indeed rammed through during all the subsequent confusion and fear. According to Testimony by Representative Ron Paul (R-Texas): “Most members of Congress were compelled to vote for the bill without even reading it.”

Analysts believe the letters were not written by a Middle-Eastern person. The FBI publicly stated they believed the perpetrator to be a lone, male domestic terrorist, obviously one with a scientific background and lab experience who could handle hazardous materials.  This lab specialist terrorist must have received anthrax vaccine recently (it requires a yearly booster shot), whether or not he made the material himself, because filling the letters was a dangerous operation. The vaccine is in short supply and is not generally accessible. Vaccination records must be available. The perpetrator also appears to be a forensic expert. In preparing and mailing the letters he successfully covered every personal trace.

All letter samples contained the same strain of anthrax, corresponding to the AMES strain in the N. Arizona State University database (which has been used for identification). "


A man named William Patrick holds five classified patents in the manufacture of weapons-grade anthrax. Before the anthrax mailings he was hired by Battelle Memorial Institute (BMI) to conduct a risk-assessment study involving the dissemination of anthrax powder through the mail system. BMI is located in West Jefferson, Ohio...The work was done at the BL-3 Anthrax Lab.

Battelle Memorial Institute had exclusive control of the Ames strain, a fact the press has either willfully or mistakenly missed. Dugway Proving Ground also had an anthrax program, but BMI directed that program too. This definitely limits the field somewhat. The FBI was drawn straight to William Patrick III - who was also Stephen Hatfill's "mentor" at Ft. Detrick - and Ken Alibeck, a BMI consultant with a background in CBW research for the Soviets...”

Then, the FBI lost the scent. Or they said they did. The stalling and outright dissembling of the FBI during the whole Anthrax episode has confused and angered reporters, independent researchers, and other law enforcement ever since. It is even surmised by some researchers that the entire anthrax scenario may have been performed by the FBI itself, such is their willful ignorance and misinformation concerning this still unsolved murder case. Couple this with the fact that early in the investigation the FBI authorized and supervised the total destruction of the Ames cultural anthrax database. This alleged destruction of the anthrax culture collection at Ames, Iowa, from whence the Fort Detrick lab got its pathogens, was nothing more than a destruction of evidence.

Francis Boyle: "It meant that there was no way of finding out which strain was sent to whom to develop the larger breed of anthrax used in the attacks. The trail of genetic evidence would have led directly back to a secret government biowarfare program. Clearly, for the FBI to have authorized this was obstruction of justice, a federal crime," said Boyle. "That collection should have been preserved and protected as evidence. That's the DNA, the fingerprints right there."

In 2003, the FBI agent involved in overseeing the destruction of the Ames Strain Database was promoted and given the Presidential Rank Award by FBI Director Robert S. Mueller. (25)


(1) Social Security
Social Security Broke In 2041?, Trustees: Go-Broke Date For Fund ...
Medicare has been bleeding red ink since last year, and the Social Security fund will start shrinking in 2018, according to an annual government report. 2005/03/23/politics/main682545.shtml
(2) Israeli Imperialism
The Israeli Connection to Sept. 11 Attacks Detailed
By Christopher Bollyn, American Free Press, April 11 & 18, 2005 issue, page 3

(3) Zim Israeli Navigation
9/11 Exposé

(3a) Why comarisons bewtween zionism and nazism are legitimate

National Socialist State of Israel

National Socialist State of Nazi Germany

(4) 2.6 trillion missing
Testimony before the House Appropriations Committee: Fiscal Year 2002 Defense Budget Request As Given by Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Hugh Shelton, and Comptroller Dov Zakheim, Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC, Monday, July 16, 2001.
SEC. RUMSFELD: Mr. Congressman, thank you very much. Your question is, of course, right at the heart of an enormously important issue for the Department of Defense. We have a panel in the Quadrennial Defens Review on this subject. We have met with it twice in the last two weeks. We're obviously going to have to meet with it again. It is a big, broad, complicated subject.

As you know, the Department of Defense really is not in charge of its civilian workforce, in a certain sense. It's the OPM, or Office of Personnel management, I guess. There are all kinds of long- standing rules and regulations about what you can do and what you can't do. I know Dr. Zakheim's been trying to hire CPAs because the financial systems of the department are so snarled up that we can't account for some $2.6 trillion in transactions that exist, if that's believable. And yet we're told that we can't hire CPAs to help untangle it in many respects.

Project Northwoods
(6) Silverstein Pull Building Remark
5:20 PM: Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapses. [CNN, 9/12/01] Media statess fires brought the [WTC7] building down, the building owner Larry Silverstein related the story of the collapse during a PBS documentary “America Rebuilds” as: "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander. ... I said ... maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it. And they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse." [PBS Documentary]
Sept 11, 2001: Hours after the attacks, a "shadow government" is formed. Key congressional leaders say they didn’t know President Bush had established this government-in-waiting. Some Congressmen state the administration should have conferred about its plans. [CBS, 3/2/02, Washington Post, 3/2/02, more]

Elite Deviance:
Barry and The Boys: The CIA, The Mob, And Americas Secret History
Daniel Hopsicker
Mad Cow Press

Daniel Lewin:

Cost of dismantling the World Trade Centers:
T(as posted, online: 7/18/06)
The Controlled Demolition
of the World Trade Center; 9/11/2001,
and "National Security Breach"
A material, 'legal deposition'
by Tom-Scott Gordon
July, 5, 2006


(10) Remote Control Of Aircraft
System Planning Corporation markets the technology to take over thecontrols of an airborne vehicle already in flight.
For example, the Flight Termination System technology could hijack hijackers and bring the plane down safely. The Flight Termination System can be used in conjunction with the CTS technology that can control up to 8 airborne vehicles simultaneously.
"The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception”, Michael Baigent, Richard Lee

(12)Bionic Zionist and Dov Zakheims F16/F15s
(, Online
Journal article on Dov Zakheim, former Bush appointee as Pentagon
Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004.

(13)Marvin bush
Prince George's Journal of Prince George, MD, and in Common Dreams; Margie Burns, Feb. 4, 2003


(14)The Jerusalem Post (08:15 - Wed) Thousands of Israelis missing near WTC,
Pentagon Wednesday September 12, 2001 The Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem has
so far received the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to have been in the
areas of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon at the time of the attack.
The list is made up of people who have not yet made contact with friends or
family, Army Radio reported.
(15)ODIGO instant messages:
Newsbytes, a news service of the Washington
Post, titled "Instant Messages To Israel Warned Of WTC Attack." The Israeli
daily, Ha'aretz, also confirmed the prior warnings to Israel and confirmed
that the FBI is investigating the warnings.

(16)Dick Cheney and NORAD
Cheney was commanding practice drills or war games on 9-11-01.
Norman Mineta (Secretary of Transportation ) Testifed in front of the 911 Commission stating that he personally witnessed Dick Cheney in the Presidential Emergency operating center (at NORAD) tracking Flight 77 for many miles before it hit the Pentagon. ( View Mineta's testimony at or )
David Griffin

(17)Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the WTC
This 166 page report with 66 figures, graphs and photographs presents the detailed evidence for the Nuclear Demolition of the World Trade Centre. It is written in as non-technical a way as possible for a wide audience, including explaining the chemistry of nuclear fission.

17a -- Gulf War Medical Records -- See Notation 1a, chapter 3

(18) Controlled Demolition Incorporated

(19) Cruise Missile Pentagon
It was like a cruise missile with wings, went right there and slammed into the Pentagon," Mike Walter, an eyewitness, told CNN. "Huge explosion, great ball of fire, smoke started billowing out, and then it was just chaos on the highway as people either tried to move around the traffic and go down either forward or backwards."
CNN.COM, "Up to 800 possibly dead at Pentagon", September 12, 2001

times oral histories
Explosive Testimony: Police & Firemen Report What Really Happened on 911
by David Griffin/Multiple NYFD Tuesday, Aug. 15, 2006 at 12:22 AM 832-428-3222
Testimony of many brave NY firemen that lost their friends and risked their lives to save others on 911
Explosive Testimony:
Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories
David Ray Griffin
Jim Dwyer, "Vast Archive Yields New View of 9/11," New York Times,
August 13, 2005.
Oral histories are available at a NYT website
( 6.
bush zapata history

On Enron's financial assistance to Bush's presidential campaign, see, 'Meet Enron, Bush's Biggest Contributor,' by Pratap Chatterjee,' at

911 commission
Philip Shenon “The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation
Book Review by Liam Hughes, Baltimore Independent Media

Explosive Testimony: Police & Firemen Report What Really Happened on 911
by David Griffin/Multiple NYFD Tuesday, Aug. 15, 2006 at 12:22 AM 832-428-3222
Testimony of many brave NY firemen that lost their friends and risked their lives to save others on 911
Explosive Testimony: Police & Firemen Report What Really Happened on 911
Explosive Testimony:
Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories
David Ray Griffin
Buzzy Krongard

(24) Israeli Stock Buyers

By Alex Constantine

Anthrax Coverup: A Government Insider Speaks Out
Posted by Steve Watson on Tuesday, July 3rd at 6:26 PM