Saturday, December 24, 2016

The Bankruptcy of America, the Corporate United States, and the New World Order

Who is running America? Have you ever asked that question?

Under the doctrine of Parens Patriae, "Government As Parent", as a result of
the manipulated bankruptcy of the United States of America in 1930, ALL the
assets of the American people, their person, and of our country itself are
held by the Depository Trust Corporation at 55 Water Street, NY, NY, secured
by UCC Commercial Liens, which are then monetized as "debt money" by the
Federal Reserve.

It may interest you to know that under the umbrella of the Depository Trust
Corporation lies the CEDE Corporation, the Federal Reserve Corporation and
the American Bar Association, the legal arm of the banking interests.

Now you know who is running America!

You might want to take exception to the name on the marquee at the entrance
to 55 Water Street.

??? . . . "Tower of Power" . . . ???

Another thing to think about -- who owns the media and the news you are
fed??? Guess Who??? An Independent Press??? Ha!!!

Did you ever hear of the Independent Treasury Act of 1921? No, you say....

The Independent Treasury Act of 1921 suspended the de jure (meaning "by
right of legal establishment") Treasury Department of the United States

Our Congress turned the treasury department over to a private corporation,
the Federal Reserve and their agents.

The bulk of the ownership of the Federal Reserve System, a very well kept
secret from the American Citizen, is held by these banking interests:

Rothschild Bank of London
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Lehman Brothers of New York
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York

The Federal Reserve is at the root of most of our present laws. Basically,
the Federal Reserve is the "STATE" of the United States.

See "Our Enemy, The STATE" by Albert J. Nock - 1935, his Classic Critique
Distinguishing "Government" from the "STATE."

See Also Charts in Text Format of Interlocking Directorships and Family
Linkages taken from "Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and
Banking Influence. Staff Report, Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing,
House of Representatives, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, August 1976."

Thomas Jefferson once said:

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties
than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks
to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by
deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] .
. . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up
homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power
should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it
properly belongs."

-- Thomas Jefferson -- The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill,

Jefferson's prophesy has come true.

How did this happen? ......Hmmmmm..... Well, that is going to take a while
to explain.

All our law is private law, written by The National Law Institute, Law
Professors, and the Bar Association, the Agents of Foreign Banking

They have come to this position of writing the law by fraudulently deleting
the "Titles of Nobility and Honour" Thirteenth Amendment from the
Constitution for the United States, creating an oligarchy of Lawyers and
Bankers controlling all three branches of our government.

Most of our law comes directly through the Hague or the U.N. Almost all U.N.
treaties have been codified into the U.S. codes. That's where all our
educational programs originate. The U.N. controls our education system.

The Federal Register Act was created by Pres. Roosevelt in 1935. Title 3
sec. 301 et seq. by Executive Order. He gave himself the power to create
federal agencies and appoint a head of the agency. He then re-delegated his
authority to make law (statutory regulations) to those agency heads.

One big problem there, the president has no constitutional authority to make
law. Under the Constitution re-delegation of delegated authority is a felony

The president then gave the agencies the authority to tax. We now have
government by appointment running this country. This is the shadow
government sometimes spoken about, but never referred to as government by
appointment. This type of government represents taxation without

Perhaps this is why some people believe the Constitution was suspended. It
wasn't suspended, it was buried in bureaucratic red tape.

Now, it is an historical fact that with the Declaration of Independence, to
provide a united effort during and after the War for Independence, the
Colonies as independent nations joined together under the Articles of
Confederation, and as Independent Sovereign States drew up constitutions
which formed governments to serve the people of each former colony.

The Articles of Confederation, after a period of 8 years, were determined to
have several flaws. The Congress of delegates called a Convention in 1787 to
correct the flaws. The Convention, instead of modifying the Articles of
Confederation as directed, in secret sessions took it upon themselves to
write an entirely new Constitution, which when ratified by the State
Conventions of the Freemen of the Individual States, created the Federal
government to serve them in those areas where the States operating
individually could not effectively serve.

In this new Constitution the people and the States delegated to the Federal
government certain responsibilities, reserving all rights not so enumerated
to the States and to the People in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution.

As a consequence, the responsibility of the State became one of protecting
the people from the tyranny of federal government, to insure that the
federal government did not reach beyond the bounds of the Constitution. This
worked fairly effectively, until 1933 when Roosevelt assumed office.

The Conference of Chief Justices, Conference of State Court Administrators,
the National Associations of Attorney Generals, Secretaries of State and
State Auditors, State Purchasing Offices, Lieutenant Governors, and State
Legislators, and the Governors of the 50 states comprise the membership of
the Council of State Governments. The Council of State Governments is
located at 676 N. ST. Clair, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

The Council of State Governments has now been absorbed into the National
Conference on Uniform State Laws run by the Bar Association.

The movement for uniform state laws dates back more than a century. The
Alabama State Bar called for uniformity as early as 1881, but it was nearly
a decade later, at the 12th annual meeting of the ABA in 1889, that the
legal community made its formal motion to work for uniformity in the then 44
state union.

New York was the first state to move, appointing three commissioners in
1890. Other states soon heeded the call: Delaware, Georgia, Massachusetts,
Michigan, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania attended the first
Conference in Saratoga Springs, New York, in 1892.

The commissioners wasted no time. They urged adoption of three acts and
proposed raising the marrying age to 18 for males and 16 for females. They
also adopted a table of weights and measures, noting that with the exception
of wheat, legal weights of a bushel varied in all the states.

By the turn of the century, 33 states and two territories had appointed
commissioners on uniform laws. In 1910, only Nevada and the Territory of
Alaska still had not; they came aboard in 1912.

An Abridged Chronology

1890 - New York state legislature passes first state act authorizing
governor to appoint three commissioners. The American Bar Association
(ABA)recommends that other states follow New York's lead.

1891 - Connecticut's Lyman D. Brewster named to chair newly-created ABA
committee on uniform law. Pennsylvania, Michigan, Massachusetts, New Jersey
and Delaware appoint commissioners.

1892 - First conference held in Saratoga Springs New York. Above states plus
Georgia attend formal meeting.

1893 - Committees appointed on such subjects as wills, marriage and divorce,
commercial law, descent and distribution.

1895 - Conference requests committee on commercial law be formed. Drafts,
Negotiable Instrument Law, precursor to Article 3 of Uniform Comme\00\00\F3rcial

1896 - Negotiable Instrument Law approved by Conference. First time that a
uniform act is adopted in every state and the District of Columbia.

1897 - For the first time, Commissioners urged to work toward enactment of
uniform legislation in their states.

1898/1899 - Sessions devoted to the consideration of proposed divorce

1899 - At the end of the 1890s, 33 of the existing 45 states and two
territories had appointed uniform law commissioners and eight uniform acts
had been drafted, each enacted in at least one state. All these acts were
subsequently superseded or declared obsolete.

1900 - Uniform Divorce Procedure Act adopted. Louis B. Brandeis begins five
years of service as member of Massachusetts commission.

1901 - Woodrow Wilson begins tenure (until 1908) as commissioner from New

1903 - ABA makes first appropriation in support of work of Conference. James
Barr Ames of Harvard Law School commissioned to draft the Uniform
Partnership Act\00\00\F5.

1905 - Samuel W. Pennypacker, Pennsylvania Governor, invites other governors
to send delegation to a national divorce conference--meets twice in 1906;
three acts endorsed.

1906 - First roll call by states as Uniform Warehouse Receipts Act is
approved. Legal scholar Roscoe Pound serves for one year as a commissioner
from Nebraska.

1907 - Uniform Desertion Act and Non-Support Act and Uniform Marriage Act
authorized. Act Regulating Annulment of Marriage of Divorce adopted. Also,
Act Providing for the Return of Marriage Statistics, Act Providing for the
Return of Divorce Statistics.

1908 - Work begins on Uniform Corporation Act.

1910 - Twenty uniform acts approved in decade of the teens. The Uniform
Partnership Act, begun in 1906, was completed by William Draper Lewis, Dean
of the University of Pennsylvania Law School.

1911 - Uniform Marriage and Marriage License Act and Uniform Child Labor Act

1912 - Uniform Marriage Evasion Act adopted. Woodrow Wilson, commissioner\00\00\EA
from New Jersey from 1901 to 1908 elected U.S. President in a landslide.

1914 - Uniform Partnership Act completed. Will be adopted by all the states.
Also Foreign Acknowledgement Act, Cold Storage Act, Workmens's Compensation

1915 - Name changed to National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State
Laws. Constitution and by-laws completely revised. Each act now must be
considered section by section during at least two annual meetings.

1916 - Uniform Limited Partnership Act as well as Extradition of Persons of
Unsound Minds Act approved, also Land Registration Act.

1917 - Uniform Flag Act approved.

1918 - Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act approved.

1920 - Certain Acts withdrawn; others declared obsolete. After pruning, 26
acts remain as recommended for passage in state legislatures.

1930 - During the 30s, Conference adopts 31 acts.

1935 - Conference entered into agreement with American Law Institute for
cooperative drafting of acts in area of common intere\00\00\F1st.

1936 - After revisions, withdrawals and acts declared obsolete, 53 uniform
acts remained as recommended for approval.

On April 25, 1938, the Supreme Court overturned the standing precedents of
the prior 150 years concerning "COMMON LAW" in the federal government.

or GENERAL in their nature, be they COMMERCIAL LAW or a part of LAW OF
TORTS." (See: ERIE RAILROAD CO. vs. THOMPKINS, 304 U.S. 64, 82 L. Ed. 1188)

The Common Law is the fountain source of Substantive and Remedial Rights, if
not our very Liberties. The members and associates of the Bar thereafter
formed committees, granted themselves special privileges, immunities and
franchises, and held meetings concerning the Judicial procedures, and
further, to amend laws "to conform to a trend of judicial decisions or to
accomplish similar objectives", including hodgepodging the jur\00\00\E5isdictions of
Law and Equity together, which is known today as "One Form of Action." [See:
Constitution and By Laws, Article 3, Section 3.3(c), 1990-91 Reference Book,
see also Colorado Methods of Practice, West Publishing, Vol. 4, pages 2-3,
Authors Comments.]

1939 - ABA gets more involved in approval of uniform law products.
Thirty-nine acts are presented to the Board of Governors of the ABA for
consideration and approval. During the same year, all acts on aeronautics
and motor vehicles are eliminated as well as the Land Registration Act,
Child Labor Act of 1930, Uniform Divorce Jurisdiction Act, Firearms Act,
Marriage Act and more. Six acts are reclassified as Model acts.

1940 - At start of decade, after deletions, etc., 53 acts out of 93 which
had been approved since the group's founding remain on the books. Drafting
committee for the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) approved.

1941 - Speaking of the Commercial Code project, the Conference president
states: "\00\00\E9is is the most important and the most far reaching project on
which the conference has ever embarked." It would take the major part of the
next 10 tear period to complete.

1942 - UCC effort begins in earnest with completion of work on the revised
Uniform Sales Act.

1943 - Members of the conference participate in drafting committee in
Washington, D.C. to work on legislation which the government might desire in
connection with the war effort. No new acts.

1944 - Conference receives $150,000 grant from the Falk Foundation of
Pittsburgh to support work on the UCC.

1945 - No annual meeting for the first time due to difficulties of civilian
transport during the war.

1946 - Falk Foundation increases its support of the UCC with an additional

1947 - Uniform Law Conference (ULC) and American Law Institute join in
partnership to put all the components together for the UCC. Uniform Divorce
Recognition Act approved.

1950 - Approval of the Uniform Marriage License Ap\00\00\F0plication Act, Uniform
Adoption Act and the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA).
The latter has been one of the most successful ULC products.

1951 - On May 18, during a joint meeting with the American Law Institute in
Washington, D.C., the UCC was approved. Later that year the ABA formally
approved the code as well. Considered the outstanding accomplishment of the
Conference, the Code remains the ULC's signature product.

One of the Uniform Laws drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners
on Uniform State Laws and the American Law Institute governing commercial
transactions (including sales and leasing of goods, transfer of funds,
commercial paper, bank deposits and collections, letters of credit, bulk
transfers, warehouse receipts, bills of lading, investment securities, and
secured transactions), The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), has been adopted
in whole or substantially by all states. (See: Blacks Law, 6th Ed. pg. 1531)

In essence, all court decis\00\00\EFions are based on commercial law or business law
and has criminal penalties associated with it. Rather than openly calling
this new law Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdiction, it is called Statutory

America as a bankrupt nation is owned completely by its creditors.

The creditors own the Congress, they own the Executive, they own the
Judiciary and they own all the State governments. Do you have a Birth
Certificate? They own you too.

1952 - Uniform Rules of Criminal Procedure approved---first venture of the
Conference into this area of the law.

1953 - Pennsylvania the first state to enact the UCC. Uniform Rules of
Evidence adopted.

1954 - Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act approved.

1956 - Gift to Minors Act approved. Will be adopted in every state. For the
first time, ULC enters the field of international law.

1957 - Massachusetts becomes second state to enact the UCC, after revisions
by the Editorial Board.

1958 - Uniform Securities Act approved.

1960 - Un\00\00\D4iform Paternity Act passed. by 1960, UCC enacted in Kentucky,
Connecticut, New Hampshire and Rhode Island.

1961 - Permanent Editorial Board on the UCC formed---8 more states pass UCC.
Constitution amended to provide that all members of Conference must be
members of the bar.

1962 - Four more states adopt UCC, including New York. Probate Code project

1963 - Third comprehensive law project approved, on retail installment
sales, consumer credit, small loans and usury. Eleven more UCC states.
William H. Renquist begins term as commissioner from Arizona; serves until

1964 - Special Committee of Uniform Divorce and Marriage laws recommends
that a study of divorce law be authorized and that funds be sought. One more
UCC state.

1965 - Divorce and Marriage Law committee instructed to commence drafting if
funds can be obtained for the project. Thirteen more UCC states.

1966 - Five more UCC states.

1968 - Much of annual meeting devoted to\00\00\DC the Uniform Consumer Credit Code
and the Uniform Probate Code ---two projects nearing completion. By 1968, 49
states, the District of Columbia and U.S. Virgin Islands have enacted the
UCC---only exception being Louisiana. A big year. Other developments in
1968: the Consumer Credit Code is approved as well as revisions to the
Anatomical Gift Act, Child Custody Jurisdiction Act and revisions to URESA.

1969 - Probate Code approved. Preliminary analysis of the uniform marriage
and divorce legislation distributed.

1970 - Controlled Substances Act and Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act

1971 - Uniform Alcoholism and Intoxication Act approved.

1972 - Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Disposition of Community
Property Rights At Death Act and UMVARA, the Uniform Motor Vehicle Accident
Reparations Act approved.

1973 - Uniform Parentage Act supersedes Paternity Act. Uniform Crime Victims
Reparations Act approved.

1974 - Conference approves Rule\00\00\E1s of Criminal Procedure and Eminent Domain
Code. Louisiana, the only state not to adopt the Uniform Commercial Code due
to difficulties in reconciling its provisions with those of the Civil Code,
adopts Articles 1,3,4,5,7, and 8.

1975 - Uniform Land Transactions Act approved.

1976 - Major revision of the Uniform Partnership Act approved; also Uniform
Simplification of Land Transfers and Uniform Class Action Acts.

1978 - Uniform Brain Death and Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act

1979 - Uniform Trade Secrets and Durable Power of Attorney acts among those

1980 - Determination of Death Act supersedes 1978 Brain Death Act. Uniform
Planned Community Act, Model Real Estate Time-Share Act and Model Periodic
Payment of Judgments Act also adopted.

1981 - Two important updated acts approved: new Model State Administration
Procedure and Unclaimed Property Acts. Also two new acts: the Model Real
Estate Cooperative Act and the Uniform Conservation \00\00\E3Easement Act.

1982 - Uniform Condominium and Planned Community Acts and Model Real Estate
Cooperative Act combined into the Uniform Common Interest Ownership act.

The enumerated, specified, and distinct Jurisdictions established by the
ordained Constitution (1789), Article III, Section 2, and under the Bill of
Rights (1791), Amendment VII, were further hodgepodged and fundamentally
changed in 1982 to include Admiralty Jurisdiction, which was once again
brought inland.

This was the FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE necessary to effect unification of CIVIL and
Actions At Law and Suits in Equity, this CHANGE WOULD ABOLISH THE

(See: Federal Rules of Procedure, 1982 Ed., pg. 17. Also see Federalist
Papers, No. 83, Declaration Of Resolves Of The First Continental Congress,
Oct. 14th, 1774, Declaration Of Cause And Necessity Of Taking Up Arms, July
16, 1775, Declaration Of Independence, July 4, 1776, Bennet vs. Butterworth,
52 U.S. 669)

1983 - Uniform Marital Property Act and Uniform Premarital agreement Act
approved. Uniform Transfers to Minors Act replaces the uniformly enacted
Uniform Gifts to Minors Act.

1984 - Uniform Statutory Will Act approved; new Uniform fraudulent Transfer
Act supersedes Fraudulent Conveyance Act of 1918.

1985 - Uniform Health-Care Information Act, Uniform Land Security Interest
act, Uniform Personal Property Leasing Act and Uniform Rights of the
Terminally Ill Act approved.

1986 - New drafting effort to revise Articles 3 and 4 of the UCC and draft
new provisions begins.

1987 - Approval of the revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act approved as well
as new Uniform Custodial Trust Act, Uniform Construction Lien Act and
Uniform Franchise and Business Opportunities Act. Also revision of Rules of
Criminal Procedure.

1988 - Final approval of amendments to the Uniform Securities Act and
amendments to Article 6 of the UCC dealing with bulk sales. Conference also
approves Uniform Statutory Form Power of Attorney Act and Uniform Punitive
and Unknown Fathers Act and takes on the controversial issue of surrogate
mother contracts with Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.

1989 - Article 4A of the UCC, dealing with electronic funds transfers,
approved. Also approved: amendments to the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act,
authorizing withdrawal of life support by a surrogate decision maker; the
Uniform Pretrial Detention Act, confining violent criminals before trial;
the Uniform Non-probate Transfers on Death Act and amendments to Article VI
of the Uniform Probate Code.

1990 - Major revision of 1970 Uniform Controlled Substances Act-- the law in
46 jurisdictions-- approved. Substantial revision of UCC Article 3 also
approved, as well as an updated Article II of the Uniform Probate Code, to
keep pace with current thinking on marital proper\00\00\DFty.

This private corruption of the law has occurred despite the Constitutional
responsibility conferred on Congress by Article I, Section 8 of the Federal
Constitution which states that it is Congress that "makes all Laws."

What does that have to do with anything? Uniform Laws seem to be a good

Well now, that is a good question. Let us continue.....

An Expose On The Legal Fraud Perpetrated On All Americans


The concept of DEBTORS and CREDITORS is very important to understand.

Every legal action where you are brought before the court: e.g. traffic
ticket, property dispute or permits, income tax, credit cards, bank loans or
anything else government might dream up to charge you where you find
yourself in front of a court.

It is an equity court, administrating commercial law having a
debtor-creditor law as the controlling law. Today, we have an equity cour\00\00\ECt
but not an equity court as defined by the Constitution of the United States
or any other legal documents before 1938.

All the courts of this once great land have been changed starting with the
Supreme Court decision of 1938 in ERIE V. THOMPKINS. I'll give you
background which led to this decision.

There is a terrible FRAUD being perpetrated on all Americans. Please
understand that this fraud is a 24 hour, 7 days a week, year after year
continuous fraud. This fraud is constantly upon you all your life. It
doesn't just happen once in a while. This fraud is perpetually and
incessantly upon you and your family.


In order for you to understand just how this fraud works, you need to know
the history of its inception.

It goes like this: From 1928 -1932 there were five years of Geneva
conventions. The nations of the world met in Geneva Switzerland for 5
continuous years in order to set up what would be the policy of all the
participating countries.

During the year of 1930 the U.S., Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy,
Spain, Portugal etc. all declared bankruptcy. If you try to look up the 1930
minutes, you will not find them because they don't publish this particular
volume. If you try to find the 1930 volume which contains the minutes of
what happened, you will probably not find it. This volume has been pulled
out of circulation or is hidden in the library and is very hard to find.
This volume contains the evidence of the bankruptcy.

Going into 1932, they stopped meeting in Geneva. In 1932 Franklin Roosevelt
came into power as President of the United States. Roosevelt's job was to
put into place and administer the bankruptcy that had been declared two
years earlier.

The corporate government needed a key Supreme Court decision. The corporate
United States government had to have a legal case on the books to set the
stage for recognizing, implementing and supporting the bankruptcy.

Now, this doesn't mean the bankruptcy wasn't implemented before 1938 with
the Erie vs. Thompkins decision. The bankruptcy started in 1930-1931. The
bankruptcy definitely started when Roosevelt came into office. He was sworn
in during the month of January 1933.

He started right away in the bankruptcy with what is known as 'The Banking
Holiday," and proceeded in pulling the gold coin out of circulation. That
was the beginning of the corporate United States Public Policy for
bankruptcy.. Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 & Executive Order 6260
"Trading With The Enemy Act."


It is a known historical fact that during 1933 and 1937 - 1938, there was a
big fight between Roosevelt and the Supreme Court Justices. Roosevelt tried
to stack the Supreme court with a bunch of his pals. Roosevelt tried to
enlarge the number of justices and he tried to change the slant of the
justices. The corporate United States had to have one Supreme Court case
which would support their bankrup\00\00\EDtcy problem.

There was resistance to Roosevelt's court stacking efforts. Some of the
justices tried to warn us that Roosevelt was tampering with the law and with
the courts. Roosevelt was trying to see to it that prior decisions of the
court were overturned. He was trying to bring in a new order, a new
procedure for the law of the land.


A bankruptcy case was needed on the books to legitimize the fact that the
corporate U.S. had already declared bankruptcy! This bankruptcy was
effectuated by compact that the corporate several states had with the
corporate government (Corporate Capitol of the several corporate states).
This compact tied the corporate several states to corporate Washington D.C,
(the headquarters of the corporation called "The United States").

Since the United States Corporation, having established its headquarters
within the District of Columbia, declared itself to be in the state of
bankruptcy, it automatically decl\00\00\F2ared bankruptcy for all its subsidiaries
who were effectively connected corporate members (who happened to be the
corporate state governments of the Union).

The corporate state governments didn't have to vote on the bankruptcy. The
bankruptcy automatically became effective by reason of the Compact/Agreement
between each of the corporate state governments and THE MOTHER CORPORATION.

(Note: the liberty of using the term "Mother Corporation" to communicate the
interconnected power of the corporate Federal government relative to her
associated corporate States has been taken.)

It is Historical knowledge that the original Union States created the
Federal Government, however, for all practical purposes, the Federal
government has taken control of her "Creators", the States.)

She has become a beast out of control for power. She has for her trade names
the following: "United States", "U.S.", "U.S.A.", "United States of
America", Washington D.C., District of Columbia, Feds. and Federal \00\00\ED

She has her own U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Parks, Post Office etc.
etc. etc. Because she is claiming to be bankrupt, she freely gives her land,
her personnel, and the money she steals from the Americans via the IRS and
her state corporations, to the United Nations and the International Bankers
as payment for her debt. The UN and the International Bankers use this money
and services for various world wide projects, including war.

War is an extremely lucrative business for the bankers of the New World
Order. Loans for destruction. Loans for re-construction. Loans for
controlling people in her new world order.


The corporate U.S. then, is the head corporate member, who met at Geneva to
decide for all its corporate body members. The corporate representatives of
the corporate several states were in attendance. If the states had their own
power to declare bankruptcy regardless of whether Washington D.C. declared
bankruptcy or not, then the several states would have been represented at

The several states of America were not represented. Consequently, whatever
Washington D.C. agreed to at Geneva was passed on automatically, via compact
to the several corporate states as a group, association, corporation or as a
club member; they all agreed and declared bankruptcy as one government
corporate group in 1930.

The several states only needed a representative at Geneva by way of the U.S.
in Washington D.C. The delegates of the corporate United States attended the
meetings and spoke for the several corporate states as well as for the
Federal Corporate Government. And, presto, BANKRUPTCY was declared for all!

From 1930 to 1938 the states could not enact any law or decide any case that
would go against the Federal Government. The case had to come down from the
Federal level so that the states could then rely on the Federal decision and
use this decision within the states as justification for the b\00\00\F8ankruptcy
process within the states.

Ah, Ha, are you beginning to get the picture?

By 1938 the corporate Federal Government had the true bankruptcy case they
had been looking for. Now, the bankruptcy that had been declared back in
1930 could be upheld and administered. That's why the Supreme Court had to
be stacked and made corrupt from within. The new players on the Supreme
Court fully understood that they had to destroy all other case law that had
been established prior to 1938.

The Federal Government had to have a case to destroy all precedent, all
appearance, and even the statute of law itself. That is, the Statutes at
large had to be perverted. They finally got their case in Erie vs.

It was right after that case that the American Law Institute and the
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws listed right in
the front of the Uniform Commercial Code, began creating the Uniform
Commercial Code that is on our backs today. Let us quote directly from the
preface of the Official Text of the Uniform Commercial Code 12th Edition:

"The Code was originally approved by its sponsors and the American Bar
Association in 1952, and was revised in 1958 to incorporate a number of
changes that had been recommended by the New York Law Revision Commission
and other agencies. Subsequent amendments that were deemed desirable in
light of experience under the Code were approved by the Permanent Editorial
Board in 1962 and 1966"

The above named groups and associations of private lawyers got together and
started working on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). It was somewhere
between 1938 and 1940, I don't recall, but by the early 40's and during the
war, this committee was working to form the UCC and getting it ready to go
on the market.

The UCC is the Law Merchant's code for the administration of the bankruptcy.
The UCC is now the law of the land as far as the courts are concerned. This
Legal Committee of lawyers put everything: Negotiable Instruments, Security,
Sales, Contracts, and the whole mess under the UCC. That's where the
"Uniform" word comes from. It means it was uniform from state to state as
well as being uniform with the District of Columbia.

It doesn't mean you didn't have the uniform instrument laws on the books
before this time. It means the laws were not uniform from state to state. By
the middle 1960's, every state had passed the UCC into law. The states had
no choice but to adopt newly formed Uniform Commercial Code as the Law of
the Land. The states fully understood they had to administrate Bankruptcy.
Washington D.C. adopted the Uniform Commercial Code in 1963, just six weeks
after President John F. Kennedy was killed.


What was the effect and the significance of Erie vs. Thompkins case decision
of 1938? The significance is that since the Erie Decision, no cases are
allowed to be cited that are prior to 1938. There can be no mixing \00\00\FAof the
old law with the new law.

The lawyers, who are members of the American Bar Association, were and are
currently under and controlled by the Lawyer's guild of Great Britain,
created, formed, and implemented the new bankruptcy law. The American Bar
Association is a franchise of the Lawyer's Guild of Great Britain.

Since the Erie vs. Thompkins case was decided, the practice of law in this
country was never again to be the same. It has been reported, that every
lawyer in existence, and every lawyer coming up has to take a "secret" oath
to support bankruptcy.

As Officers of the Court they have sworn to uphold the law as it exists, and
as they have been taught. In so doing, not only do the lawyers promise to
support the bankruptcy, but the lawyers and judges promise never to reveal
who the true creditor/party is in the bankruptcy proceedings (if, indeed,
many of them are even aware or know).

In court, there is never identification and appearance of the true character
and principle of the proceedings. If there is no appearance of the true
party to the action, then there is no way the defendant is able to know the
CAUSE OF WHY YOU ARE IN FRONT OF THEIR COURT. The court is forbidden to tell
you that information.

That's why, if you question the true nature and cause, the judge will tell
you "It's not my job to tell you. You are not retaining me as an attorney
and I can't give you legal advice from the bench. I suggest you hire a


The problem here is, if you hire a lawyer who is pledged not to reveal the
true nature and the cause, how will you ever find out the nature and the
cause? YOU WON'T! If the true nature and the cause of the action against you
is revealed, it will expose the real creditor from whom this action and
cause came. In other words, they will have to name the TRUE creditor. The
true creditor will have to state the nature and the cause. The \00\00\E6true creditor
will have to say "It's a bankruptcy proceeding." The true creditor will have
to say, "I'm the creditor and he's the debtor."

That declaration would open the door for you to question "Who the hell are
you? How did you get attached to my back and by what vehicle did I promise
to become a debtor to you?" In this country, the courts on every level, from
the justice of the peace level all the way up...... even into the
International law arena, (called the World Court), are administrating the
bankruptcy and are pledged not to reveal who the true creditors really are
and how you personally became pledged as a party or participant to the
corporate United States debt.

What would really kill these people off, would be to compel the
International Bankers to send a lawyer into the courtroom and present

The International Bankers told these various countries that they were now in
a state of bankruptcy. The countries had been taken over by the
creditor/bankers. And there was no choice, but for all these participating
countries to declare bankruptcy.

If they didn't agree to declare bankruptcy, the bankers threatened to
collapse the economies and thereby put the countries back into the
depression like the one from which they were just emerging. The bankers made
an offer they couldn't refuse. To review and elaborate: In 1930 there was a
world wide depression.

The Bankers said, "Look. You can do it either of two ways. The easy way or
the hard way." "You just accept the bankruptcy and we'll let you out of the
depression. If you don't, you're on your own." So all the countries involved
agreed, because they realized that the International bankers had them by the
throat. The countries therefore agreed that over a period of several years
that they would pass statutes and legislation for the implementation of the
bankruptcy in favor of the international bankers.

Now, it would probably be correct to say that the key bankers were the
Rothschild's and their agents by way of Rockefeller, by way of the Federal
Reserve Bank. Who the bankers were is immaterial. The fact remains that
there was an International bankruptcy, and an International conspiracy to
cover it up.

There was a banking creditor who made the offer; the countries accepted the
offer in order to enable the representative countries to continue without
revolution and to allow the politicians to remain comfortably in place.
Under a delusion of solvency the countries were allowed to continue to
operate as though they were solvent; while in fact, the representative
countries were bankrupt.


The bankruptcy scheme was/is an extremely clever and diabolical plan. How
did they possibly pull this scheme off in the area of real estate? The
bankers did it with real estate, the same way they did it in the area of
Federal Income Taxes.

These Foreign bankers simply and deceptively devised ways and means to con
you into declaring yourself as a "CITIZEN" or a "RESIDENT" of the corporate
U.S. Remember the corporate United States is Bankrupt per agreement and
public policy.

After you have been tricked into claiming you are one of their corporate
United States Citizens, you are given a social security number which ties
you to certain meager "benefits" and "privileges." Then, the bankers con
your employer to function as an unpaid tax collector to con you into filling
out their W-4 intangible property gift forms and 1040 voluntary agreements.

These slick paper agreements establish your "voluntary" indebtedness to the
banker creditor. If at any time you decide to balk at this scheme because
you don't like it, the real creditor never has to make an appearance in
court to list the true nature and cause of the action which is being brought
against you.

You end up dealing with an agency. The agency can conveniently grant itself
immunity from prosecution because all it is doing (without your knowledge,
of course) is administrating the bankruptcy to which the government agreed
to per the Geneva meetings.

The court system never lets you put the original creditor on the courtroom
stand, so you can ask him how he got attached to your back. The system is
set up in such a way that the true creditor is protected and never has to
make an appearance and never has to answer any of your questions or produce

Therefore, the true creditor never has to produce the law that gives him the
right to pledge you (your body and labor) into indebtedness

Why? Because the Geneva agreement in 1930 was done by treaty. The bankruptcy
was not done by legislation. The agreement came first; signed in secrecy,
THEN Congress began to pass legislation to fulfill the bankruptcy obligation
required by the treaty.

Legislation being passed by Congress was henceforth and is thereby
bankruptcy legislation. When cases came before the courts, the courts could
make decisions based on the new controlling law of bankruptcy.

It had nothing to do with Constitutional rights. Now, any case brought in is
under the new bankruptcy law and is not considered as a true constitutional
case. It is now a bankruptcy case as distinct from, but cleverly disguised
as a constitutional case.


The members of the Supreme Court, of course, realized what was happening to
them and the system of law. The court was being asked to perform in a
creditor, debtor bankrupt proceeding to the benefit of the banker creditors.

The members of the Supreme Court said, "NO. We will not give you a bankrupt
proceeding decision that you can then enforce against everybody; a decision
not only effecting corporate Washington D.C. but also having effect within
the corporate state governments."

This, by the way, is fraud. It wouldn't be fraud if the government of
corporate Washington D.C. and the government of the several corporate states
declared bankruptcy then let the people know about the bankruptcy. (Notice:
when I say corporate "government" I don't mean you and me. You and I are not
the corporate government.)

The corporate government is the corporate capital of the corporate state.
The government is a neutral government zone known as the corporate capital
of the corporate state. The government is where the corporate state is. It
is corporate headquarters. Just like corporate Washington D.C. is the seat
of the corporate Federal Government.

The capital of the corporate state is the seat of the corporate state
government. If the corporate Federal Government and her subsidiary corporate
state governments want to join forces and declare bankruptcy that's not
fraud. This is their corporate business.

However, it is fraud when those two corporate entities declare bankruptcy
but do not disclose to you, me, and every other American, that they have so
declared bankruptcy.

Further they have not and do not disclose that their intention is to get you
and every other American in this country to pledge to pay off their
corporate debt to their corporate creditors. The corporate bankruptcy is the
corporate state and federal responsibility, not the responsibility of
Americans, The People.


"We the People" who created and signed the
contract/compact/agreement/charter of, by, and for the Constitutional
Corporation (U.S.) using the trade name of the "United States of America,"
is a corporate entity (legal fiction) which is DISTINCT AND SEPARATE from
Americans or the unenfranchised people of America.

The private natural American people did not create the corporation of the
United States. The United States Inc. did not create the private natural
American people. America and Americans were in existence prior to the
creati\00\00\F0on of the United States Corporation. The United States Corporation has
located its U.S. headquarters in Washington D.C.

Virginia State (state territory) gave land to the newly formed United States
Corporation. Notice here, we have a state giving something of value (land)
to the United States. The United Stales Corporation agreed in the
Constitutional contract, to protect the States.

Instead, because of their bankruptcy (Corporate U.S. Bankruptcy) this
particular U.S. corporation has enslaved the States and the people by
deception and at the will of their foreign bankers with whom they have been
doing business. Our forefathers gave their lives and property to prevent

Today, we are again enslaved. Private natural American people have been
tricked, deceived, and set-up to carry the U.S. Inc. perpetual corporate
debt under bankruptcy laws. Every time Americans appear in court, the
corporate U.S. bankruptcy is being administrated against them without their
knowledge and lawful consent.

That is FRAUD.

All corporate bankruptcy administration is done by "Public Policy" of by and
for the Mother Corporation (U.S. Inc.).


The corporate bankruptcy is carried out under the corporate public policy of
the corporate Federal Government in corporate Washington D.C. The states use
state public policy to carry out Federal public policy of Washington D.C.
Public policy and only public policy is being administered against you in
the corporate courts today.

The public policy that is dictated by all the courts, from the smallest to
the most powerful courts in the world, is public policy. This is why I said,
in another tape that the Russian people would be enslaved into indebtedness.

What will happen is that it will become public policy in Russia to have the
people go into joint corporate debt. The Russians will be forced to promise
to pay those debts. They will be forced to pay off on those corporate debts.
Corporate public policy is the crux of the whole bankruptcy implementation.

Corporate public policy is forever a Corporate public policy and the laws
that have passed since 1938 are all corporate public policy laws dealing
only with corporate public policy.

Understand that U.S. corporate public policy is not an American public
policy. The public policy is OF, (belonging to) the United States
corporation. This U.S. corporate bankruptcy public policy is not OF
(belonging to) America, the Republic.

The Erie vs. Thompkins 1938 case was a decision based upon public policy.
All decisions at any level since 1938, have been public policy decisions.
All statutes, rules, regulations, and procedures that have been passed,
whether civil or criminal, whether it is Federal or State, have all been
passed to implement the public policy of bankruptcy.

Since 1933, when FDR came into office, he brought in public policy. He
established that it was the public policy of the government to call in all
the gold. It was the public policy of the government to declare a banking

It was the public policy of the Government in Washington D.C., (the Federal
Government) to give out government assistance. Public policy operates the
same within the states. All Federal court decisions can only be handed down
if the states support Federal public policy. The state legal system must be
compatible with the Federal legal system.


This is why, when people like us go to court without being represented by a
lawyer, we throw a monkey-wrench into their corporate administrative
proceedings. Why? Because all public policy corporate lawyers are pledged to
up-hold public policy, which is the corporate U.S. administration of their
corporate bankruptcy.

That's why you'll find stamped on many if not all our briefs, "THIS CASE IS
The reason for this notation is that when we go in to defend ourselves or
file a claim we are not supporting the corporate bankruptcy administration
and procedure. The arguments we put forth predate 1938.

We come in with Constitutional law etc. All these early cases support our
rights not to be in bankruptcy. However, the corporate court, lawyers, and
judges have promised to give no judicial recognition of any case before


Before 1938, the law was not a public policy law. All these old cases were
not public law deciding cases. Today, the cases are all decided under
corporate public policy. The public policy exists in order to administer the
bankruptcy for the benefit of the banker creditors and to protect the banker

Corporate public policy can allow the creditor to say to the corporate
legislatures, "I want a law passed requiring my debtors to wear seat belts.
Why? Because I want to be able to milk my debtors for the longest period

It\00\00\EF doesn't behoove the creditor to allow all of his labor producing debtors
die at an average age 30 years. What would happen to the bankers' lending,
interest, penalties, increase, repayment etc., on the entire funding and
lending process if the average American life span was only 30 years? Why,
the bankers would have to have 2 1/2 times the current consumer population
to equal their current take.

The bankers would need (instead of 250 million Americans) 600 million or
even more. Maybe the bankers would need 2 Billion Americans because the
individual can't contract for debt until he/she is 18 or 21 years of age.
Therefore, if the average life span is only a 30 year period, the creditor
could collect on the debt for only 12 years.

Now, if the bankers can just get people to live an average of 70 years) you
are talking a whopping 50 years of indebtedness for which they contract and
for which they are forced to pay back with usury/interest. With this
situation, the banker creditor \00\00\F7can now float loans worth 50 years of
potential indebtedness and its payoff with interest in the name of the
people, as opposed to 9 to 12 years.

The creditors and their property and their people are well taken care of.
The creditor doesn't want the population to decrease per se, unless, it is
convenient for the debtor to run up debts in another's name and then
liquidate that debtor or that group of debtor people. For example let's
consider the AIDS problem today among the black people. What better group to
inject AIDS into than the black people?

Read the Strecker Memorandum on AIDS and the World Health Organization
connection. This documents their tainted vaccination program in Africa and
elsewhere. Why not kill them off? Don't you understand that the blacks as a
whole have absorbed all the debt that they can? The blacks have reached the
maximum of the debt that they can carry. In fact, they have gone over their
limit to pay back. They are now heavily into welfare, public housing,
medicaid, medicare, food stamps etc.. Now, the situation is that instead of
paying off the creditor, they have become a drain on the creditor. The
creditor must now pay them to live and take care of them. What creditor in
his right mind wants to spend money on a bunch of people from whom he can't
collect any revenue?

The corporate public policy of the corporate United States and the states
and the county and of the cities are that YOU must take care of these
people. You must provide them with welfare etc. Why? Because when you, as a
member of the corporate body politic allow laws to be passed which says the
minorities must be taken care of, then the corporate legislature can say the
public policy is that the people want these people taken care of. Therefore,
when given the chance, the legislature can say the public policy is that the
people want these blacks and poor whites to be taken care of and given a
chance, therefore, we must raise taxes to fund all these benefits,
privileges and opportunities.

This is what these people need to make them socially, politically, and
economically equal with everyone else. The legislatures have passed all
kinds of statutes providing for huge indebtedness and they float the
indebtedness off your backs because you have never gone into court to
challenge them by telling them it is not your public policy to assume the
debts of other people. On the contrary, all the court decisions coming put,
indicate it is the corporate public policy and it is your willingness to
support the corporate public policy to pay off these debts.

Remember, "public" means of and for the corporate Government. It does not
mean of and for private people. "Public" means corporate government. It is
corporate government policy. When they talk about public debt, they are
talking about corporate government debt and your presumed pledge against
this corporate created debt.


How do they work this scheme in the area of real estate? These banker creeps
have made an agreement that it is corporate public policy, that all land
(property) be pledged to the creditor to satisfy the debt of the bankruptcy,
which the creditor claims under bankruptcy. They get away with this the same
way they get away with any other case that is brought before the court,
whether it is a traffic ticket, IRS, or whatever.

Here is how it works. You have signed instruments giving information and
jurisdiction to the bankers through their agents. The instruments (forms)
you signed include, but are not limited to the following: social security
registration, use of the social security number, IRS forms, driver license,
traffic citation, jury duty, voter registration, using their address, zip
code, U.S. postal service, a deed, a mortgage application, etc. etc.

The bankers then use that instrument (document) under the Uniform Commercial
Code (UCC) as a contract/agreement. These documents are considered
promissory contract where you promise to perform. This scheme involves you,
without you ever becoming directly in contact or in contract with the true
creditor. What's more, you are never informed as to whom that true creditor
is and it is never divulged to you the true nature and the true cause of the
paperwork that you are filling out.

If you will examine your real estate deed, you will find that you promised
to pay taxes to the corporate government. On property you originally
acquired through a mortgage, you will notice that the bank never promised to
pay taxes. You did. The corporate government at all levels never promised to
pay taxes to the creditor. You did.

In tax and collection problems relating to real estate being enforced
against you, you will notice that there is no mention in the mortgage or the
deed stating the true nature and cause of the action.

Since you have made the promise to perform, you get a bill every year for
property taxes. You don't realize that the only way th\00\00\EAey can bill you for
taxes is through your own stupidity of agreeing to pay the tax. You
volunteered. They took advantage of you, conning you to promise to pay
properly taxes. When they send you their bill, they are coming against you
for the collection of the promise you made to the creditor.

Now the creditor on the paperwork appears that it is the local bank. The
bank has loaned you credit. The bank hasn't loaned you anything. It is not
their credit to loan. This is why the bank can't loan credit. There is a
credit involved, but not the bank's credit. It is the credit of the
International Bankers.

The International Bankers are making you the loan based upon their operation
of bankruptcy claim which they presume to have against you personally as
well as your property. Now, let's say you get a tax bill and you decide "I'm
not going to pay it." You will find that the courts and the lawyers and the
county agencies are set up to protect the true creditor simply by not
identifying the creditor. By not being identified as the true creditor, the
international banker can make you a credit loan that has no value in

In the case of real property, he claims to loan you the use of your own
property for which you pay a tax as rent. He is allowed to do this because
you are presumed by statutory law and the banker to be in bankruptcy. This
fraud is not revealed because he does not have to make an appearance in
court to present and defend his claim. His name is not mentioned in the

Let's say you are not aware of your remedies provided for you within the
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC provides or allows you to dishonor
the county's presentment of the tax bill. You don't pay your tax bill. You,
therefore, just sit on it and don't do or say anything. A couple of years go
by and all of a sudden you are being sent letters to pay up what is owed or
else in a certain period of time, your property will be taken from you and
put up for tax sale.

Now here is what is interesting........ If you don't pay your tax bill and
they contact you asking you to pay it and you don't do it, they will declare
that you are in default. It is based on that default, as provided for in the
UCC, that they sell your property for the tax (rent).

However, the county never goes into court to put into the record the
identification of the real creditor. And the county does not state the true
nature and cause of the action against you (bankruptcy action disguised as a
tax action). Why? Because, under bankruptcy implementation, they have
developed a legal procedure which is based upon your promise to pay. This
procedure provides that they don't have to come to the court to get a court
order authorizing the sale of your property. Therefore, the real creditor
never makes an appearance in court.

The reality is, you are denied any possibility of appearing in court to
exercise your right to challenge the creditor. To ask if he became the
creditor under "public policy." To ask if it is under "public policy", just
what is the "public policy?" And how did you (as an international banker)
become "creditor" to me and everyone else in this country (American people).
They don't want you to ask the real creditor (the International Bankers), to
produce the documents upon which your personal debt is established.

If they were forced to go into court, they would have to produce the deed or
mortgage showing you knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily promised to pay
the corporate public debt. You did not knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily
promise to pay any U.S. Corporate Bankruptcy obligation made in the 1930's.

This would, of course, expose their racket. The fact is, that, there was
absolutely no debt connected to you until you agreed to it through their
deception and fraud. The deception in a broader sense, permeates the
education system and the news media, etc., to sell you on the idea that you
 a statutory "U.S. citizen" and "resident of the United States."


Your property is pledged for the rest of your life upon your signature and
your promise to perform is pledged into perpetual debt. The bankers don't
even bother to go to court They leave it up to the agencies to administer
the agency corporate public policy.

It is the public policy of that agency to bill you on your promise to
perform. If you don't pay, they follow up on the public policy on notice of
default and give you one more chance to pay. Then they proceed to sell the
property at a tax auction. They never go to court or appear in court to back
up their claim against you. Did any of your government licensed and
controlled teachers ever stress that your signature is your most valuable
personal property?

Did your government teachers ever tell you that any time you sign any
document, you should sign it "without prejudice," or with "All R\00\00\EEights
Reserved" above your signature. This means you are reserving your God given
unalienable rights which cannot be transferred and all other rights for
which your forefathers died.

The Corporate U.S.. Government provides, or at best pretends to provide for
this reservation of rights under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 1-207 and
1-103. You need more information in this area.

It is not in the best interest of the United States Corporate "PUBLIC"
schools to teach you about their bankruptcy proceedings and how they have
set the snare to Compel you into paying their debt.

The Corporate "PUBLIC" schools are strictly designed for their Corporate
citizen/subjects. That is. the Corporate U.S.. Public School citizens.

Notice all the emphases on being a "good" Citizen. Basically all their
teachers and their students are trained to produce labor and material in
exchange for valueless green paper called "money." It is not money, it
functions "AS" money.

Lawful money must be backed by something of value. Bankers take your labor,
services, and material (homes, cars, farms, etc.) in exchange for their
valueless corporate paper. This paper is backed only by the "full faith and
Confidence of the United States Government" THE MOTHER CORPORATION.

I do not have faith or confidence in the U.S. BANKRUPT CORPORATE GOVERNMENT
the sovereign American people into their bankruptcy obligations.

Their fraudulent money laundering process promotes your payment on the
corporate government's bankruptcy debt. This debt is mathematically
impossible to pay Off. You and your family are in continual financial
bondage to the international bankers. They love it so!

Black's Law Dictionary 1990, defines "Money Changers" as: of a
banker... today handled by the international departments of banks. "Let me
think for a moment, what did Christ do to the Money Changers?" Oh, yes, he
severely interfered with their activity. Three days later he was crucified.
Lincoln was killed for interfering with the money changers. Kennedy was
slaughtered for interfering with the money changers.

Let's return to the subject of your property, and the tax sale for not
paying property taxes. In this situation under a standard deed (not common
law deed) you are actually in default. Not because you understand the
default or you like being in default, you just are in default of the tax
payment. So they put your property up for sale.

At the tax sale, Joe Doe, average American, bids on your property and gets
it. Now, there is a procedure he must go through step by step to establish.
He is required to give you another chance. You have six months and a day to
pay off the default. If, at this time, you pay off the amount the county
says you owe, plus penalties, interest, fines, etc., then your property is
taken off default status and it is yours to continue to pay taxes on th\00\00\EBe
next year.


There was a deal struck that, if any person who doesn't have a lawyer to
bring a case before the courts, and this person proves the fraud, and speaks
the truth about the fraud, the courts are compelled to not allow the case to
be cited or published anywhere. The courts cannot afford to have the case
freely available in the public archives. This would be evidence of the
fraud. That is why you can't hire an attorney. An attorney is compelled to
uphold the fraud.

"I'm Here To Help You."
"I Have The Governments Permission To Practice Law."
"I'm A Member of the Bar."

The attorney is there for one reason. That reason is to make sure the
bankruptcy scam (established by the corporate public policy of the corporate
Federal Government) is upheld. The lawyer's will cite no cases for you that
will go against the bankruptcy in corporate public policy.

Whatever the lawyers do for you is a bunch of Bull Shit. The lawyers have to
support the bankruptcy and public policy even at your expense. The lawyers
can't go against the corporate Federal Government statutes implementing,
protecting and administrating the bankruptcy.

For all cases cited, those in the US Code or the state annotated code or any
other source, you may be sure that they are only those selected cases that
support the public policy of bankruptcy. The legal system has to work that
way. After the last 30-40-50-60 years of cases after cases having been
decided based upon upholding the bankruptcy, how could the legal system
possibly allow someone to come into court and put in the record substantial
information and argument to prove the fraud?


Can you imagine how damaging it would be, if they allowed your case to be
cited in another case, or if they allowed the public to examine a copy of
your brief that exposes evidence of the fraud?

This exposure would render null and void everything for which they have
worked so hard. Wouldn't this \00\00\DDexposure make the people mad? Wouldn't this
exposure mean there would be blood running in the streets? Especially the
cities where the poor people have been really taken by this diabolical

What they are concerned about is that the case never be cited. That goes
against the bankruptcy for fear of exposing the bankruptcy and the people
will then pick up their guns and shoot the SOB's.


You said you wanted to be a lawyer. Well, I hope you've read this carefully,
because here is the legal system you're headed to serve, and serve you will.
You say you wanted to be a lawyer so you can find out what oath they're
taking, in "secret", behind closed doors in solemn preparation for the
"business of the court" as judges and lawyers.

Now you know the oath. The oath is simply to uphold the bankruptcy. If you
want to be a lawyer and want to make a living as a lawyer, be careful. They
will weed you out at the beginning if you don't bring in your paperwork
under the bankruptcy procedures.

If you try to defend your clients and try to help your clients they will get
rid of you. They will pull your license. So you spent all that money and
time going to school under the guise of helping people and you're wasting
your time. Without a license you can't go into a courtroom. I would think
about this if I were you.


Here is what happens. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the
Lawyers Guild of Great Britain. The American Bar Association is not
connected primarily with what happens in any case on the local level.

However, when a case leaves the local level, by that is meant, the state
court, city court or the justice of the peace, or even the federal court;
and goes to the appeal's court, it would appear that the American Bar
Association takes notice of the case.

It would seem that the American Bar Association must have an agreement that
any action brought on appeal, must be reviewed by the American Bar
Association. If this is true, it would make sense. How else would the
American Bar Association, a branch of the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain,
which is the legal arm of the Rothschild's Dynasty, be able to monitor and
administer the corporate bankruptcy?

It would appear that the American Bar Association would be compelled to
review all appeal cases and to make certain any case brought under common
law or the constitutional law that would expose the bankruptcy, would be
immediately stamped on the back that "this case is not to be cited or

I believe that this is the stamp origin and purpose of the stamp message in
such cases. The justice department may be able to do that in Washington D.C.
I can't see where any judge or lawyer could have the authority to stamp or
label the case as one not to be cited for future cases. I think that is an
official stamp from the American Bar Association.


Now, Mr/Ms. Law Student, if you're still attending classes and you have a
good professor, ask him/her about just where the stamp comes from that
you've seen on many cases. Just who put it on the paperwork and just who
authorized the citation restriction.

Just who is tampering with the law?

There is one thing certain the creditor and or his agents are watching these
cases very carefully. The creditor and his agents must balance their books.
When you think of the IRS, be aware that the IRS is an agent of the
creditor, the corporate International Bankers. This is just one of the
Bankers' state side agencies. The General Accounting Office (GAO) is another
agency they use for this country.

This is where all the accounting goes on to keep track of the debt. All the
states have to send reports to Washington D.C. Washington D.C. has to send
reports to the (GAO).

Take a look at your state Comptroller's Annual Report to the Governor of
your state. I found it in the library located in the city of the corporate
state capital.

Look under "Trust Fund" for each state sub-corporation like the state
courts, IRS, Banks, Education, etc. you will be amazed at the amount of
money being pumped into the Trust Fund from the various Corporate State
Departmental Revenues (all revenue is referred to as taxes: fines, fees,
licenses, etc.).

There are millions and billions of your hard earned worthless federal
reserve notes, "dollars", being held in "trust." This money is being
siphoned off into the coffers of the International Bankers while the
corporate government officials are hounding you for more and more tax

All this accounting system is NOT so the people will know what is going on.
The accounting reports are for the bankers and creditors to keep tabs on
just where their collections are coming from. The bankers want to know if
the bankruptcy debt payments are coming in and just how much and from what
sources. This accounting is the purpose behind M1, M2, M3, M4. and M5. All
this accounting is closely monitored. Maybe every day, but at least once a

These M's are the reports of the amounts of money in circulation. The amount
of debt out there, and the amount of credit out there. The floating of debt
in the form of bonds. There are five different categories. This system had
to come into existence in order for the creditors to be on top of the
bankruptcy at all times. This system allows the creditors to figure out and
know exactly what is going on in their domain.

It all makes sense. Don't the bankers hire bill collectors? Creditors hire
bill collectors to snoop around do see why you're not paying. They want do
know how much you are going to pay so they can figure out how much will be
coming in. How much they will collect. They want to know who will pay and
who won't.



Here is what is going to very quickly happen internationally. All of the
governments around the world are going to unite. They will create one big
giant credit union for collecting the debt for the International Bankers. We
have allowed ourselves do get into this very sad situation, but THAT IS THE

The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill
the world with fools. -- "State Tamperings with Money Banks" -- Herbert
Spencer (1820-1903)


This Page on the Web started Dec 7, 1996, The 55th Anniversary of the
Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, which precipitated the entry of the United
States into World War 2.

IN MEMORIAM of the many Sovereign Citizens in all wars
Who believed they gave their Oath and their Lives to Defend The Constitution
for the United States against all Enemies, Both Foreign and Domestic, In the
Preservation of Liberty and Freedom and Justice for All.

Reproduction of all or any parts of the above text may be used for general
information. This HTML presentation is copyright by Barefoot, December 1\00\00\00996.

Barefoot, 18446 W. Holland Road, Post Falls, ID 83854

Three mighty important things, Pardn'r, LOVE And PEACE and FREEDOM.




"Either you're going to go along with your mind and the truth, or you're
going to yield to fear and custom and conditioned reflexes. With our minds
alone we can discover those principles we need to employ to convert all
humanity to success in a new, harmonious relationship with the universe. We
have the option to make it."

R. Buckminster Fuller, 1895-1983 - Citizens Administration. - Like World Wars? Fight 'Em Yourself. - Inside Covert Operations. - An Option For Success. - Yes! Positive Futures Network. - Understanding Economics. - Home-Made Power. - Counter-Propaganda. - Who's Bribing Who? - Individual & Community Liberty. - Citizens Intelligence Agency. - The Emperor's New Clothes. - Common Sense. - Money: Where's It Come From? - Democratic Confederation Works Best. - Prosperity Without Pollution. - Need Money? Negotiate With These Guys. - Criminal Ignorance Agency. - Defense Intelligence Agency. - Confused But Useful.

Thank you,

Jon Chance
72 Peterborough Street
Boston MA 02215 USA

No comments:

Post a Comment